AChat Forum

Discussions about sex => Shemales and their lovers in AChat => Topic started by: Adera on March 09, 2011, 12:08:34 PM

Title: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Adera on March 09, 2011, 12:08:34 PM
(http://www.funnyadultgamesplay.com/products/let-your-lover-control-you-2048.jpg)(http://www.funnyadultgamesplay.com/products/let-your-lover-control-you-2418.jpg)

What does everyone think about this pose? I haven't tried the pose yet but I will.

The pose costs 199A$ and is for for both MF and MS.

Too bad its yet another dom/sub pose only for MF and MS, one for FS and FF would have been nice imo.
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Janine Dee on March 09, 2011, 01:01:26 PM
Agreed, FF would be cool, but as always I make sure I keep my expectations realistic while keeping things like the hope generated by the implementation of the  double ender.
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: hatcher on March 09, 2011, 03:15:07 PM
Got both  and tried the M/F one and  love it some of the moves are....forced suck,titty smack,face smack,foot rub of the pussy, and a couple of others but as far as the fem side didnt look like much. overall i'm pleased
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: caramelcups on March 09, 2011, 04:39:19 PM
Well Hatcher if your pleased then so am I  ;)
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Adera on March 09, 2011, 04:58:14 PM
The shemale side is like this:


Would have been nice to be able to lift my face and look at him but looking down at the floor is more submissive and fits the pose, the guy can lift my face too look at it if he wants too though.
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Urban on March 09, 2011, 06:37:30 PM
It could be a good pose to chain with the "kneeling BJ". Just one thing.. slap and spank are still in loop mode  >:(
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Bear on March 09, 2011, 09:22:18 PM
hmmm,... now why wasn't this available when the bets with someone over cribbage were going on. :P
 Wouldn't have thrown those games with this motivation.  ::)
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Mistress_N on March 10, 2011, 04:47:39 AM
And again I cant understand why the fu** they forget dominant poses for SF and FF
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: islandsun on March 10, 2011, 09:10:38 AM
personelly would be a cold day in HELL , me kneeling naked to a guy begging to be slapped , Same as guy obedience a kick to the balls ! Ask for a cowboy hat and get a slap to the face ! F--king sweet !  This puts me on a dark side .
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Bear on March 10, 2011, 09:52:18 AM
@Mistress there are differences in anatomy that's why..., honestly if you and Janine have not jumped on and giving your suggestions to the team as to minor tweaks you might like to see you are missing a real opportunity.

Did get a chance not to play but look at this pose. There are a number of compatible actions which do not cancel between the partners.
Females actions are similar to the shemales,..though it is rub clit. Nice that the breasts play can occur with the the rubbing action.  That is the upside.

Downside as noted is the repeated action.

Have a preference of a throat grab over the slap. ,... stroking of the cheek makes sense if you are going to slap it. I am not certain if these developers are aware that if you use a violent action, there should be a counter balance of tenderness to the action(slap) and location (cheek). 
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Adera on March 10, 2011, 10:01:56 AM
Hmm I wonder how I would get on the floor all regretful and submissive while he is a little upset but cool... maybe I'm caught in a very naughty situation or something. :P
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Bear on March 10, 2011, 10:14:41 AM
Did you spill coffee on those papers?
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Adera on March 10, 2011, 10:22:37 AM
Oh right... they where important. Looks up at Bear with big puppy eyes. :P
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Janine Dee on March 10, 2011, 11:05:07 AM
Bear I rarely say what I would see changed to make any pose FF. I've always felt I can't since I haven't really "seen" it. I'll talk about those that I feel have the potential, but I stay away from the detail work because I don't "know".

I do agree on the balance of actions as well as grabbing the throat would be nice.
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Mistress_N on March 10, 2011, 11:36:20 AM
@Mistress there are differences in anatomy that's why..., honestly if you and Janine have not jumped on and giving your suggestions to the team as to minor tweaks you might like to see you are missing a real opportunity.

How i can do that...
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Bear on March 13, 2011, 11:25:41 AM
@Janine It's why I try list a few of the actions, to give folks including those who have not used it or  a better idea or feel what is going on. You have been around long enough to understand the basics of the poses here...and you certainly know that I am one to speak up and criticize or praise specifically what I see in them.
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Janine Dee on March 13, 2011, 04:51:03 PM
I get that Bear, I do. I just can't feel the texture unless I've been there, and for me all the positions and suggestions I need the texture.

Still, I'm better at suggesting new positions then revamping the old.
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Bear on March 13, 2011, 05:26:30 PM
hmmm making me think of a new thread,.. suggestions on revamping some of the poses. I for one like to see the tweaks occur if for no other reason then to make what we have here a good more enjoyable. Having said that I need to acknowledge the disparity between FF and MF pose numbers  (not to ignore the shemales...just acknowledging something Janine and I have hashed over through the months). Hopefully by making recommendations the gods that tweak the minds of the development team might flip that switch with an epiphany of discovery for all to enjoy.
Title: Re: New position "Obedience"
Post by: Unhealer on March 14, 2011, 01:27:01 AM
turn straight now! j/k j/k