 Messages |
Topics |
Attachments
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Steelsilk
1
« on: April 07, 2013, 01:19:43 AM »
2
« on: March 15, 2013, 10:13:33 PM »
So I did a little pose counting today and this is what I came up with; Men & Men 17 Poses Shemale & Shemale 17 Poses Shemale & Men 36 Poses Women & Women 44 Poses Shemale & Women 45 Poses Men & Women 85 Poses So here lies the rub. The dev department bases it's direction and it's time based on active member participation. Smart for any business really. 'Know your target audience.' So how many gay men do you know that aren't playing playing Achat? Let's talk to them and get some family in here people...so we can earn some new poses.  Me personally I'll buy any Shemale & Shemale poses the dev department can hash out. It's the most exciting part of my day when I see a new one but that doesn't happen without better statistics...it makes me a sad monkey.
3
« on: March 11, 2013, 11:28:38 PM »
The pose feels a bit rigid to me but I love it. My only real complaint is there is no SS version of the pose...like so many other SM poses.
4
« on: October 13, 2011, 08:15:01 PM »
You have to pose the question don't you. Does no one want to address the elephant in the room? The blatant double standard in the game that says if you want to play the game as a gay avatar, AChat really doesn't really give a damn what you want. Shemales are a subclass of servants for men and women. Shemales seeking shemales, women seeking women, men seeking men...this game is NOT catering to you. So why create the classes at all? why go half way?
I have pulled my credit card and my account will under soon. I'm so not worried about it. There's only so many times you can fuck another shemale in one pose and get enjoyment out of it. I don't think I'm being unreasonable if I ask for the occasional new pose. Don't treat the shemales as equals fine but give us something to go on. Here's an idea, add the abilities shemales have with men in the bent over the table pose to the ones we already have. Lick back, fast action, and the splits and hand job. That would be a good place to start. This would take no work at all from the development team. Besides that nobody really gives a damn about having 200 new costumes if they have to come off and you fuck in 1 pose.
More poses, less outfits. how about it?
I will continue to log in and let the game check for updates but until I see a new SS or SSS sex pose I'm just logging right back off again.
5
« on: August 03, 2011, 07:51:13 PM »
How about a glory hole pose. You could build a dirty truckstop bathroom and make it a whole theme. AChat could turn around and sell a new room and the pose for A cash. The glory hole would be cheap to code the animations as the wall will not have to move in virtual space. It seriously limits the animation variables.
6
« on: August 03, 2011, 07:45:04 PM »
Jurassic Park Movie - Dr. Alan Grant. ~ T. Rex doesn't want to be fed, he wants to hunt. Can't just... suppress 65 million years of gut instinct.~
Men are similar. They want to hunt, to conquer, to overcome obstacles.
I think a teasing pose would be a good idea. Where the Dominant roll can rub, lick, pinch, etc... but no penetration until the submissive's excitement goes above say 80% (just an example) and then the other buttons for the hardcore action light up.
7
« on: August 03, 2011, 07:31:27 PM »
Against the wall.
The pose I'm thinking of would primarily be a Male-Female and Male-Shemale pose where a guy fucks a female/shemale up against a wall anally. Vaginal sex could of course be an option in a Male-Female variant of the pose but I would really like the pose to have lots of anal options. 
Maybe the pose could start out with some teasing, the female/shemale standing facing the wall and the guy behind her. From there she could tease and wiggle her ass for the guy and he could rub his cock against her, caress her and maybe give her a playful spank.
Then penetration with difference in speed and force, maybe one option where he presses her up against the wall in a quite dominant way and another where she could push back against him.
While in a lower tempo a little spank, some sensual caresses and maybe he could be able to turn her head to the side for a kiss.
love it..but let's throw SS in there too. would be nice for us to have a second sex pose. Just Two!!!
8
« on: August 03, 2011, 07:28:35 PM »
They would have to change (a ot of) animations for smaller/bigger cocks. There are already flaws in certain poses with breasts. So the options are:
1. Accept a 'magic' willie that changes size depending on the pose you are using
2. Accept flawed animations, (fucking/sucking air,etc..)
3. Wait for an eternity for the dev-team to adapt all poses so different penis sizes will work visually..
To be honest, I'd rather they focus on the quality of the poses and actions instead of putting effort into adapting animations. On the other hand, create a bigger cock and the majority of the male populatioin will suddenly grow inches. Which will take away most of the trouble or reprogramming different cock sizes...
Shemale and Female- if she's stroking the shemale off and the shemale stands up to finger or use the didlo, The character mapping is completely wrong x-y-z. So because the current animation is still not 100% I'd say hell no...leave the penis alone. make some more poses to balance out the SS,MM, and FF. it's not like they need to build from scratch. just tweak the existing code to fit the different body styles. ...different penis sizes would be a mountain of new code. it would take years.
9
« on: July 16, 2011, 11:26:21 AM »
lol.. I would emphasis the invite declines...instead... that is the rudest of distractions just to assume.
you know it wouldn't be a bad thing to remove the FREE users ability to invite at all. The invite button really should be for paying members. I mean just ask nicely right
10
« on: July 16, 2011, 11:22:49 AM »
Also I do play a lot with the free users. I have converted 2 free users into VIPs because the game is still pretty new and people that have money are still very skeptical about whether or not they should invest. I think phasing out the free users is still a bit early but should be on the 5 year plan somewhere once the game is better recognized.
11
« on: July 16, 2011, 11:11:37 AM »
I think we should just put game limiters in for FREE users. A counter that locks them out of the game for a day after 2 or 3 ignores or 10 invite declines. It would definitely improve the conduct of the FREE users.
12
« on: July 16, 2011, 11:04:22 AM »
As poses go this one is definitely a really good one. this is where the girl I'm with always loses her mind. More "good" options than any other pose...in the game I think.
Still I'm with Adera on this one. I would love to be on the receiving end in SS or MS.
13
« on: July 16, 2011, 10:43:12 AM »
I think it's important to keep it kinky whatever the AChat corporate ruling is. Nobody wants to do boring virtual sex. That's everyday life. Getting a blowjob while getting fucked, a rusty trombone, .... Have Patrick Duffy show up and hang out in a chair. I don't know but kinky!
14
« on: July 16, 2011, 10:26:29 AM »
The middle position would definitely wipe me out early too 
15
« on: July 11, 2011, 10:35:29 PM »
SS From behind is so much fun but what if we flipped the submissive on their back...yes now I have toys to play with. I know there's a programmer in a dark basement room somewhere that will hate me for saying this but how about an SSS train  yes there would have to be some limiters put on the pose to do this or it would lock the game up but that pose would be so much fun. CHOOOO CHOOOO!!!! SS from behind should have a RUSTY TROMBONE option!! yeah that's right I said it
|
Show Posts
