1
A-Team ask you / Re: Erotic sound contribution appeal
« on: September 16, 2010, 04:59:29 PM »
Well in my opinion - action sounds should be 2 way:
1)Default taken from some porn movies
2)Custom - letting each user to upload own sounds.
For more iteraction - own custom sounds will be cool!
Support my idea!
Nick
1)Default taken from some porn movies
2)Custom - letting each user to upload own sounds.
For more iteraction - own custom sounds will be cool!
Support my idea!
Nick
Hi Friends,
you probably noticed already, that Achat has nice music, but no erotic sound during the action. AChat itself is able to play sounds for the animations, just we have not added the proper wav files yet.
Here is a great opportunity to contribute erotic sounds to develop AChat with us together. How can you do that and what could we use? Here are the most important aspects:
- Send short sounds as wav files via email. Moaning, laughing, enjoying, etc. - any kind of short sound you can imagine could be heard during the action.
- We need your permission to use the sound in AChat without restrictions, so please do not send any copyrighted material!
- We absolutely prefer if you record your own sound (or the sound of your friend/girlfriend, supposing he/she knows what you do!), so if we like it, all AChat users will hear it during a given action. Exciting, is not it? :-)
- The sound should be connected with a given animation variation, e.g. a smack when the girl slaps the face of the boy. Of course the sounds of pleasure are much more interesting... So please add written instruction, which animation variation should use that sound.
- As the animations usually run in a cycle, the sound must be short enough to be able to repeat it with the cycle. The program is able to repeat it also in a random way, also not in every cycle.
- As reward you will be listed among the contributors of AChat with the name you choose (nickname or real name).
Ok, that is the first appeal, we will see if you like the idea. We will answer all of your questions if something is not clear enough.
Regards,
tom