Skip to content

Game Idea. Change 3some Invite to see all participants first.

- Not logged in to forum -

Home › Forums › Share your creative ideas › Game Idea. Change 3some Invite to see all participants first.

Tagged: 

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 21, 2010 at 11:06 am #4758
    apollo13nut
    Participant

    Game Idea. Change 3some Invite to see all participants first.

    OK, I have tried group sex here, and several things: 1) there are like no new positions for it since I signed up back in March (2 months), there there are new mf or ff sex positions twice a week now (monday and wednesday, at least in the US)…..but anyway, that’s not the issue of my topic.

    When I get invites to group, first of all I know it has to be either m-f-f, m-m-f, or m-m-m in my case since I am a male. But when I receive an invitation, I can only check the person sending the invitation….I cannot check the “third” person (the sender is 1, I am 2, the other person is 3 in my argument here)….my suggestion is changing the invitation to show the involved parties….this doesn’t see to hard since the user sending has to select 2 people….the form for the invite can show a sender and have a check and a “secondary invitation to” or something so we know ALL parties involved.

    May 21, 2010 at 4:51 pm #16908
    Charista
    Participant

    I totally agree. In my AChat description I say I'll do MF, MMF, and MFF,  yesterday I received my first 3way invite and I got into the room and found it was FFF, I thought oh h*ll no and hit the exit button. No offence to the ladies that like FFF but this gal has to have at least 1 “real” cock involved in the action to be happy.

    May 21, 2010 at 8:43 pm #16909
    Anonymous
    Guest

    this was suggested a while ago.
    guess the team doesn't want to change it at all  ???

    May 21, 2010 at 8:43 pm #16910
    Anonymous
    Guest

    ps good idea that you added a poll.  maybe now the team will consider your suggestion 

    May 23, 2010 at 12:00 pm #16911
    Lover
    Participant

    If I see the answers to the poll, everyone wants to know who is the 3rd person. If there are more people thinking the same maybe the A-Team again will listen to us.
    Good idea!

    May 23, 2010 at 10:48 pm #16912
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    I WOULD like to see it on there, but I must admit that I have yet to run into the problem because when I'm heading into any room I've usually talked to one or both, and made my preferences clear.

    My question is are people taking Cold Group Sex Invites? Not asking about the third person? Or being lied to?

    All of the above?

    I ask because I'm guessing the development team would ask those questions before programming a new Group Sex invite.

    May 23, 2010 at 11:10 pm #16913
    sinnnn
    Participant

    I get cold invites and since i don't answer them, I don't have this problem.  My threesome is always a discussion, if you answer cold invites you basicly playing russian roullette( i know i spelled that wrg).  I guess your idea would work for those who except the cold invites or maybe you should ask the person who sent you the invite questions.

    May 23, 2010 at 11:13 pm #16914
    Dannyello
    Participant

    Let's see partners ,first,  before entering.  To see  orgy members . That's normal.

    July 19, 2011 at 5:54 am #16915
    apollo13nut
    Participant

    Well I want to bring this topic back current because someone messaged me and simply said “Can you help me?” and I asked “With?” and was answered with a GROUP INVITE…I declined it because I consider that a cold invite, but she begged me to do a MMF with her….and she refused to tell me who the guy was, so I'm bring this post back from the “dead”….Really, why can't we see who the third person is? (and it's been over 120 days!)

    July 19, 2011 at 10:18 am #16916
    zzAnthonyzz
    Participant

    Great idea.
    Or at least tell you what type of group MMM MMF MSM MFF etc

    July 19, 2011 at 10:40 am #16917
    WilliamXS
    Participant

    An other great idea

    Would save time for askin who more will  in a 3some

    July 19, 2011 at 2:51 pm #16918
    Bear
    Participant

    Nods, for those who accept blind 3some play it is a missing component.

    I refuse blind 3somes, after the first one I accepted which ended up being a MMM,…a wtf moment in my early experiences here.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Optimizing new Forum... Try it, and report bugs to support.