Skip to content

SF. More Dominant Shemale with passive Female poses

- Not logged in to forum -

Home › Forums › Shemales and their lovers in AChat › SF. More Dominant Shemale with passive Female poses

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20 total)
1 2
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 10, 2012 at 10:25 pm #5734
    needu2nite
    Participant

    Hi everyone.
    I am new to this site and I must say I love it already. I purchased 10000 extra A $ and they are almost all gone!!!!!!
    Anyways why I am posting.
    I am a Shemale who is very submissive and have a thing for Females. I have all the poses for that category except for the slow dance

    Anyways my question is why can is there not the option to change position with the females like there is with other shemales.
    I have been with a few Females who are very dominate and would like that option to be the dominant one.
    Anyways keep up the good work folks love the site!!!!!!
    Toodles and Kisses !!

    June 10, 2012 at 10:44 pm #65275
    chien_lubrik
    Participant

    Hello Needu2nite, and welcome both on the Dreamworld, and in the Forum .

    Poses with same partner's Gender are all “switchable” I think, Man with man, Woman wt woman and Sheman wt sheman.
    It is possible because both of our Avatar's mainframe are the same and so they can be changed in a action without code change.

    With different gender it can't be so easy because interactions are different and so each action have to be recode and added as and separate action.

    For exemple the “Pampered” action is available with SM active / FM passive ( pampered woman )  or FM active / SM passive ( pampered shemale ) but they are TWO differents poses ( and some actions are of course differents … obviously ) ( and so the switch is not througt an ” Action Change ” button.

    So I think the answerd of your question is : For it is a huge work to make a new pose, the development  Team ( Who did a great work ) may not yet develped the reverse pose for each possibility . I am sure that a day it will come ( like for the “Pampered” one )

    Anyway You may understand I know nothing, I was just guessing about your question, my answer is just my thinking, feed with previous topics on the forum about similar topics. 

    June 11, 2012 at 12:32 am #65276
    needu2nite
    Participant

    That does make sense and I do not believe I did not think of that, I am quite computer literate and what you said makes perfect sense. Thank you for the welcome and the information and I agree the development team have done incredible work and very pleased with the site.
    Toodles and Kisses for now until next time

    June 13, 2012 at 3:15 pm #65277
    Rukya
    Participant

    i write this request here cause i have see that when the dev team give a pose to the shemales one cathegory is left to the side . There is SF (where the woman receive) but there is rarely the other side , the FS (ex : the last poose or the rub from behind) . this could be made with the MM poses by exemple .

    June 13, 2012 at 4:03 pm #65278
    chien_lubrik
    Participant

    Please be very welcome needu2nite.

    Rukya, that is perfectly right :

    There is SF (where the woman receive) but there is rarely the other side , the FS (ex : the last poose or the rub from behind) .

    And you are right that Woman are mostly passives with Sheman's Poses and actions. I don't know why.
    Of course some poses where shemen are passives ( or be the Receiver ) I think it was just a choice of priority for developping Poses .
    And with time, new poses where Shemen will be the reveiver will be release.

    In fact I think that, not for all poses, but generaly there is an order for gender to be giver to receiver :
    Man -> Sheman -> Woman I don't know if anybody have the same feeling ?

    June 13, 2012 at 5:50 pm #65279
    Adera
    Participant

    Yes, that is the predetermined idea that many seem to have and to be frank, it annoys me. Females that tries to stimulate my mounting urges or whatnot just doesn't get it, it just gets silly and boring in my opinion. Often I start to wonder if they have ever made love to another woman… because clearly, it often feels like they have no idea at all of how to go about it.

    June 13, 2012 at 6:38 pm #65280
    chien_lubrik
    Participant

    Yes Miss Adera ( I hope you don't mind I call you Miss. )

    Even I slightly have a different opinion about what I feel when people just want my … manhood. ( Woman or Man either )

    As a slave, my primary please is to serve and make them happy, even if that mean they want me to be active, or, as you said stimulated …
    But my feelings is very disturbing when this happen, I both please to fullfill their wish and desire, and both hate the role they want me to have.

    I really think that many peoples ( fortunatly not all ! ) think I please having this part of me stimulated. Well … that's not true …
    And I really fully enjoy when I can forget that unsightly part of me. ( And that's also why I created my second Avatar ) .

    I don't know why they still want to act differently ( not all, people that understand us are many in spite not the majority )
    with us than with woman ?
    Is that because our manhood part is so obvious in poses ? So they can't think we are girls …
    Is that because they just see in us a pair of nipple to knead and a dick to suck ?
    Are we for some Woman an half step between lesbian and hetero ? ( and for some Men an half step to Gay self-acceptance )

    I really don't know and I thinks reasons to them to act like this are many.

    But I agree with you Miss Adera. Some peoples just want to listen or understand that having care about our penis is not a great way to make us horny.

    I had decide to post this for peoples who like being with us ( Transgenders ) and who feel a lust for us .
    So if they read me, maybe will they pay a little more attention to what we feel.

    My intention was really not to hurt anybody, but yes I am asking myself lot of questions about what people think I may please, and what
    make they want to have intercourses with me .
    If I hurt anybody, Please trust me It was not my intention to upset, insult, hurt anyvbody !
    I am just talking about my experiences in the Dreamworld. And , another time, some peoples ARE kinds, understanding and loving.

    Please Miss Adera, consider I have a deep respect for you, your posts and opinions. If I bother you, or misunderstood what you was saying, tell me please.
    I know we are very different, for our opinions, our past surely are not the same, so we may have different point of view and opinions.

    Having different opinions, and sometime clash about some topics don't mean I don't respect yours.
    Well … may I think that variety make the peoples more interesting ?

    Accept my apologies if I bother you, or if I had unclear writing.
    Please accept my best humbly regards. 

    June 14, 2012 at 12:09 pm #65281
    Adera
    Participant

    One problem lies in that they think that our sexuality lies in our physique and that's where it all goes wrong… it's the same thing as thinking that all men and women are heterosexual just because of their physique.

    Another false assumption they have is that since our physique is that of a “shemale” our minds are like that as well, but they're not, we have a female gender identity so treating us kinda like men will just appear silly and weird to us.

    June 14, 2012 at 10:53 pm #65282
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I hope they will give us the Let's Talk pose for SF too.

    June 16, 2012 at 1:36 pm #65283
    PseRamesses
    Participant

    One problem lies in that they think that our sexuality lies in our physique and that's where it all goes wrong… it's the same thing as thinking that all men and women are heterosexual just because of their physique.

    Another false assumption they have is that since our physique is that of a “shemale” our minds are like that as well, but they're not, we have a female gender identity so treating us kinda like men will just appear silly and weird to us.

    agree so hun. im more femme sub seducin with a man, passionate lover with a woman, complete slut with another sister BUT im always a woman in play and at mind.

    June 21, 2012 at 2:33 pm #65284
    RonnieScuzz
    Participant

    I would like to see more shemale poses with female – at present they are limited and compare badly to the male/female poses – I appreciate the possible technical difficulties this may cause but would really like to have more poses – there are at least 14 male with female poses I would love to have and have emailed them before, probably to the wrong place as I've not had a answer – the poses I really want to have are wheelbarrow, 69 sideways, kneeling boy, legs up, spoons, kneeling rider, bridge, woman controls, deep impact, lick seat, hanging beauty, lift your leg, lick me quickly and love carrier.

    I appreciate that shemales are in a minority – it would be amazing just to have the same blow job poses as males do, but really I would appreciate being able to have all of the above poses (and maybe more) – I would really like to know why they are not available to shemales.

    I love achat and don't want to sound as if I'm complaining, but would appreciate someone letting me know if any of them are feasible.
    Thanks for reading  Jinxxx

    June 21, 2012 at 3:30 pm #65285
    christinak
    Participant

    Id love to have some more poses for FS that are easier to switch between partners.  Sometimes I  have men who are not shemale, but use those characters because they want the forced feminization experience.  Most men in this situation do not want to penetrate the female, they want to be penetrated themselves by the female wearing a strapon.  These poses are, for the most part, lacking from what I can see.  So it makes it harder for me to help them live out that fantasy.

    June 21, 2012 at 5:01 pm #65286
    Adera
    Participant

    Good ideas Ronnie and Christinak… even though that's not really what appeals to me when with a woman I guess poses and options like that would find their place with some.

    June 23, 2012 at 4:19 pm #65287
    kittenlepurr
    Participant

    One problem lies in that they think that our sexuality lies in our physique and that's where it all goes wrong… it's the same thing as thinking that all men and women are heterosexual just because of their physique.

    Another false assumption they have is that since our physique is that of a “shemale” our minds are like that as well, but they're not, we have a female gender identity so treating us kinda like men will just appear silly and weird to us.

    The problem is they think that shemales are very much the guy mental scape which has that aspect as i understood. The thing is thats just as untrue for women as shemales. You are all girls mentally and thats why all shemales for me I refer to them as girls. Because you all are.  It is just the gender you were given with was not reflecting the person you truly are so you sought to change to reflect the actual person within.

    A courage that is to be applauded regardless. Or at least hugged -cuddles Adera-

    I have said many times there should be poses adapted for Shemales from the MF, FF and other options that fit. Ronnie and Christinak have good ideas.

    June 23, 2012 at 6:39 pm #65288
    Bear
    Participant

    Wll I think the failure to provide the shemale as a receiver in options is a HUGE part of the problem. The teams approach tends to cater more towards the “masuline”/giver  side in their actions…

    A serious need is required here to let her have that feminie experience with males… there are just too few options for the MS variate. With the limited developer resources… they are pretty much torn in direction which way to proceed imo, the  easy way seems just to treat this with the continued imbalance of the Shemale in that “guy” scrape” as Kitten puts it.

    A big shame ….IMO

    Ronnie the why is simple economics… putting that much effort into a smaller population is not profitable. There has been a better growth along the lines of offering poses to the shemales, but it still has a long way to go. There too are the issues of the disparity between the other orintataions.. FS as a recieiver… SS play… MS play; those options can't be ignored and at this point if anything is required, the needs in this class are to treat the shemales along the more femintine options. enhanced foreplay… breast play… create more options to cater to those wanting an expansion of the MS play seem to me to be of a higher need..

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20 total)
1 2
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Optimizing new Forum... Try it, and report bugs to support.