Pose Ideas. Suggestion for Threesomes. A Voyeur Stance.

- Not logged in to forum -

Tagged: but 2 people sex. Voyeurism., Pose Idea. 3some room, Voyeur Voyeurism Exhibitionist MMF Poses Watching Masturbating Boy Watcher, Voyeurism

This topic has 40 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 4 months ago by Vaughan.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 40 total)

Author

Posts
January 26, 2010 at 5:52 pm #12756
tom
Participant
Hi Nicoquin,

I know that you know

I just wanted to explain myself

tom
January 26, 2010 at 7:36 pm #12757
Nicoquin
Participant
lol

and i saw you will give new 3some scenes ! yes !!!! thanks a lot !

best regards !
January 26, 2010 at 8:39 pm #12758
linkai
Participant
It will be wonderful if the three partner can have actions together
January 27, 2010 at 12:11 am #12759
Anonymous
I agree with linkai. What we have is great but it would be nice if the 3rd participant could do more than just masturbate.

Also, since the 3somes have been available, the AChat program has been running slow a *lot* and also I have lost my connection many times since then. And it is affecting everyone else, too. Anything you guys can do to fix that? I think the 3some poses have added a lot more traffic.
January 28, 2010 at 4:37 pm #12760
Willyco
Participant
Tom you are right (obviusly…) but will be better to know if the invite is for a MFM or a FMF or a MMM or a FFF… trivially to know if you have the appropiate options in your possibility or not…

please, if is possible, indicate the 2 names if not the sex gender only…

Thanks a lot

to Danyello…

I'm sorry little Danny, I prefere that the options for the sex group are limited at the male premium users only… the advantages to be premium between the mass of the males
January 28, 2010 at 10:25 pm #12761
Anonymous
I agree with Nico & Willy. We should know the names & genders of the people inviting us. Though I do have to say that quite a few times already I have been asked in the “chat box” if I would like to join a threesome, they have not all been “cold invites”.
January 30, 2010 at 1:46 pm #12762
tom
Participant
invitation process will be improved a bit later, please have patient!

tom
January 30, 2010 at 4:17 pm #12763
Nicoquin
Participant
invitation process will be improved a bit later, please have patient!

tom

sure we will, tom
January 30, 2010 at 9:49 pm #12764
Dannyello
Participant
Tom you are right (obviusly…) but will be better to know if the invite is for a MFM or a FMF or a MMM or a FFF… trivially to know if you have the appropiate options in your possibility or not…

please, if is possible, indicate the 2 names if not the sex gender only…

Thanks a lot

to Danyello…

I'm sorry little Danny, I prefere that the options for the sex group are limited at the male premium users only… the advantages to be premium between the mass of the males

And I have some opinion ! What is the problem? What is your problem?
February 2, 2010 at 3:28 am #12765
Willyco
Participant
no problem dear… only sorry because we are often in opposite front of ideas…
February 2, 2010 at 3:44 pm #12766
Dannyello
Participant
Willy ,is natural that group sex was only for male premium users, and, of course, for all girls . That is in fact, in reality.
December 22, 2010 at 12:28 am #5056
BoySlut
Participant
New Function – Voyeurism.

What about voyerism?
December 22, 2010 at 12:47 am #46688
Trekmanalpha
Participant
I thought I mentioned that in one of my posts… but that was a couple of weeks ago. I want it.
December 22, 2010 at 12:50 am #46689
BoySlut
Participant
Sorri that I mentioned it again then. I made a search with voyer term but it gave me 0 results.
December 22, 2010 at 1:44 am #46690
Anonymous
because it's “voyeur”
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 40 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Optimizing new Forum... Try it, and report bugs to support.