Game Idea. Free Male able to do group with Two Premium Players.

[vikka]

Free males and group sex if invited by Prem Female.

I fully agree with and appreciate free males not being to invite for group, but as a paying female I would like to be able to invite a very lucky free male, can u change it to make that distinction?

[Mistress83]

Game Idea. Free Male able to do group with Two Premium Players.

Hello once again,

one thing that I kinda agree is that free male users can’t do group,

but a cool thing would be if a free user could be invited to join a group with 2 premium.
Better explaining, if I want to do MFF and I’m premium, the other F is premium a free M could be invited,
this could be applied to MMF cases: M premium, F premium, M free.

I think is a cool idea, this may also serve has an incentive for free users become premium.
Leave your opinion and have fun. :-* 😛

[Lover]

Hi Mistress83,

I support your idea. The 3rd person can be a non-premium, if the other members are premium.

[Janine Dee]

I don't really run into this, but I support it in theory. With two Premiums you know AChat has been compensated. So this seems reasonable enough.

[apollo13nut]

I agree it would be nice, but I can see the excuses for not doing it coming already…….I requested they add a second “check” button to 3-some invites to see both partners, but alas, nothing…….good luck

[TanyaTanya]

I agree, can't we decide if a guy's earned it? Also, not many guys like mmf. Being able to grab a free male user to join us would be ace. x

[Bear]

I'll reiterate a position I have stated. Some things need to be premium only.

[Janine Dee]

They may however be pointing out that males for MMF may be in short supply. I agree premiums deserve privileges since we're paying for the party, but I know how difficult it can be finding two F's who are in the mood for a FFF. I can only imagine how it would be if there was an even smaller group to choose from.

[Bear]

That would be corrected if more poses were available for the 3somes,…the interest would change. An enticement like that would drive up memberships.

[TanyaTanya]

True, some things do need to be premium only. Altho if free girls can do group it seems a bit unfair on the guys and us who can't find the guys. I dunno, maybe it's a lose lose situation.

[Bear]

It was discussed at length under the “economic theory and A$” thread. Best I can say is dangle the carrot and tell him to join up with a promise of things to come. There is no other site that I know of that gives such freebies as this to  to non-subscribers.

Premiums pay the way,…and as the development and increased load continues we pay more for the non-premiums use. That's the lose-lose.

The cost isn't that much.

[Janine Dee]

That's very true if more people were willing to stand up and pay their share things would be easier for everyone. The problem is that happens EVERYWHERE. People always want the free lunch, and if that puts someone else out well that's just not their problem.

[Bear]

That is why I consider it their problem. I pay, they don't. They shouldn't get the run of the chicken coop for the hell of it while my rates paying for the eggs go up.

[Lover]

It's unfair that free members (male) are not allowed to join 3-some. It's unfair that free members not can change all the clothes they have. It's unfair that free members not do have all the positions. It's unfair, that we have to pay for fun.

It's also unfair, that we want to get money from our companies and employers.

[Janine Dee]

Agreed Bear, I'm not thinking of them. I'm thinking of the premium women who want men for their threesomes.

[Author]

Posts