Skip to content

General Chat

- Not logged in to forum -

Home › Forums › Upgrades and newly added features › General Chat

Tagged: 

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 93 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 27, 2010 at 4:27 pm #42467
    Lover
    Participant

    100% agree :D

    September 27, 2010 at 4:38 pm #42468
    Lover
    Participant

    @apollo13nut why didnt you just turn off chat ?

    I can't speak for apollo, but if you wan't to take part at the general chat, you can't turn it off.

    September 27, 2010 at 6:03 pm #42469
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    Let's assume the Development Team reads this.

    Would we want to say pay 1A$ every time we open a room?

    In that case I would want to be able to invite in whomever I wished.

    I would prefer private rooms being a premium perk. Then people have more reason to pay for memberships, while chat comes back and private rooms do exist. Now, would we want only premiums to be able to enter private chats? Or just that premiums can open rooms but invite anyone they want?

    My vote would be it takes a premium to open, but they can invite anyone in.

    September 27, 2010 at 6:20 pm #42470
    TightFit74
    Participant

    I would like to see it as a perk for premium members to be able to open chat rooms and be able to invite anyone to it. And I would pay a higher membership fee for it instead of paying $A everytime I open a chatroom. It should be freely usuable. And it would be nice if the chat rooms had no limits as far as numbers of people entering.
    The advantage of premium members opening their own chatroom, is that you have a moderator (the one that opens the room) to control what happens inside. Conversations will be 'confined'to the circle that are discussing a subject while “general chat” remains open as a lobby for people to meet. Including the ones that have a two word vocabulary

    September 27, 2010 at 6:23 pm #42471
    Adera
    Participant

    An only premium jacuzzi private room would be awsome, just to get a nice premium perk.

    September 27, 2010 at 6:35 pm #42472
    TightFit74
    Participant

    Swimwear required! (nice chance to design some new clothing, for the gus too!)

    September 27, 2010 at 8:41 pm #42473
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    I would say the swimwear should be optional.  ::)

    I would also say that I can't see private rooms as THAT large of a programming hurdle to require a bump in membership fees. I'm just brainstorming ways to make it both available to all (general type chat) while making a premium perk to encourage memberships.

    September 28, 2010 at 9:19 am #42474
    Unhealer
    Participant

    it wouldnt be that bad if there was no actions in the jacuzzi and just kind of scenery

    September 28, 2010 at 3:51 pm #42475
    Bear
    Participant

    It's a chat room Unhealer,…and for those with a good imagination and descriptive abilities such a setting could launch some interesting encounters. ;D

    It should be a premium feature. Staying out of the non-premium conversation though. I have the feeling at some point someones going to gripe about their exclusion if it occurred. One though though if excluded, excludes all non-premiums.

    September 28, 2010 at 4:35 pm #42476
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    I'm honestly unsure. I DO believe that opening rooms should be a premium perk. It's if frees should be allowed in rooms that I'm unsure of. I mean I've met some wonderful frees (and yes I encouraged them to go premium) and I wouldn't mind being able to invite them into a chat room I would open, but I think a key point between you and I Bear is I would see that as a perk for me while you would see that as a perk for them.  ;)

    Seriously though I think that's the big issue here on AChat. Where those lines are drawn between the premiums, the frees, and letting the premiums use the frees.

    Yes I know “use” is an ugly word, but I felt it more accurate in this case.

    September 28, 2010 at 4:58 pm #42477
    Bear
    Participant

    Really have no honest opinion in this other than whatever the rule it should be applied evenly. I think that is one area you and I will agree on.

    September 28, 2010 at 5:02 pm #42478
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    Yep, right now it's just a matter of feeling out where it should fall.

    September 28, 2010 at 5:25 pm #42479
    Lover
    Participant

    I am not sure if non-prem should be allowed to enter a room, a prem has opened. But I think, only prems should be allowed to open a room.

    September 29, 2010 at 7:13 am #42480
    Bear
    Participant

    As a thought, if it is an added feature premiums only. If one has to purchase the option,..then it should be restriction free. 

    September 30, 2010 at 2:49 pm #42481
    TightFit74
    Participant

    Lover, in a way, according to me, you said it correctly. A non-prem should be allowed to enter a room. By the one that opened it. And I do agree that should be a prem option only… Non-prems will get their fill in a the 'lobby' I should think. You could tell from what happened in the general chat room.
    One more thing though, a comment from the moderator was that the other 3 rooms were hardly used. But if you add an application/addition to the program unannounced, with no explanations how it works and what the feature are, then you shouldn't be surprised that people have to figure out how it works. I'm convinced that in due time, all chatrooms would have filled up…

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 93 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Optimizing new Forum... Try it, and report bugs to support.