Skip to content

MF Pose Review REQUEST. 73. Glory Hole

- Not logged in to forum -

The forums Woman with man in AChat MF Pose Review REQUEST. 73. Glory Hole

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 32 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #68351
    christinak
    Participant

      I think the development really missed the point with this one.  The whole reason to have a glory hole in the first place is that you don't know who is on the other side of it.  On the service side, all you are presented with is a penis with no face to put it together with.  Doing it here has already made that one essential element invalid.  I really wish they would pay some more attention to the 3some poses, rather than coming up with this kind of pose.    :-

      #68352
      kittenlepurr
      Participant

        or better yet comeout with more shoes ;)

        #68353
        christinak
        Participant

          SHOES!!

          tumblr_lcy7rmQy5T1qfoo7bo1_500.jpg

          #68354
          Rukya
          Participant

            i think that to give the “spirit” of the glory hole in achat , it will need to have access to a kind of random room invitation , then the partner avi stay unvisible , and , when the parner talk , replace his/her name by “? ? ? ?”  ;D

            So i think this pose will never have the spirit of the glory hole and will stay a sex pose like others i suppose  ;)

            #68355
            Bear
            Participant

              It's use will be in RP… the right scnario can be set up can make it work… blind encounters…which a person is just going to have to let the imagination roll with. The imagination is really what this place is all about, setting aside the little inconsitencies in favor of the minds eye of the encounter. Taken as a straight forward pose, it just won't have the same effect.

              I can scene with this… just as it is…the use will be a bit limited though

              #68356
              christinak
              Participant

                Very limited….not woth the effort in a virtual environment IMO.

                #68357
                Azrielle
                Participant

                  SHoes? Did someone say SHOES!

                  Where? How Much?… and are they on sale?

                  hehehehe… ok, we better not start a stampeed towards the shop… after all, the peeps all linin gup to buy the Glory hole pose may just be inexplicably diverted, and we wouldn't want to disappoint the dev team for their efforts…

                  Do I sound just a wee bit feciscious? Good… lolz.

                  Mwah!
                  Az.

                  #68358
                  sm3369
                  Participant

                    Very sad that they did not make this available for the shemale members like myself.  :(  Just my two cents here!!!!

                    #68359
                    Rukya
                    Participant

                      about clothes you dont have to worry , shemales and women are equal to this point  ;D . For the poses , when the LGBT team will come back from vacations i'm sure they will do this pose for you and for MM too ( for the ones who are interessed ) . And this is the question .

                      How many shemales or homos will buy this pose if dev team do it for you ?

                      #68360
                      sm3369
                      Participant

                        about clothes you dont have to worry , shemales and women are equal to this point  ;D . For the poses , when the LGBT team will come back from vacations i'm sure they will do this pose for you and for MM too ( for the ones who are interessed ) . And this is the question .

                        How many shemales or homos will buy this pose if dev team do it for you ?

                        Thank you for your reply Rukya. This is only one example here of how I feel that we (shemales) are always getting the short end of the stick. Not too long ago there were other poses created that we never got. Example-The talking pose. Where you can sit with your partner & talk. This was never made available for FS.  :( For me, it would be important to have this. This is why sometimes I feel that the developers aren't interested in helping the shemales out here. And it bugs the heck out of me that I pay the same fees as someone who gets twice as many poses as me.

                        Just my two cents…..

                        #68361
                        Lover
                        Participant

                          Back to the pose…

                          Some month ago I had the idea of a glory hole. It was bit for fun, bit for rp, bit for something different from the exisiting ones.

                          Some things are made very well. The kissing action, the fucking(if you like anal) and fingering, the licking head. But some are also very silly (IMO), slap ass, grab wall, hit the wall… Sex also is fun, perhaps this is more for fun then sex?
                          If you do some special RP it might be a good choice. For example visiting a swinger club, sex on a public toilet…
                          The wall reminds me of my soldier times – we had to climb ober those walls and I had to  laugh when my ava grabbed it. I tried to climb over at once, lol.

                          It's not useful for usual play in room. But at least, Az and I had lots of fun in trying it ;)

                          #68362
                          Bear
                          Participant

                            That is probably the best way to look at the use of this pose… as something fun to play with in certain RP settings.

                            For that it fits the bill..

                            #68363
                            hentaiboy69
                            Participant

                              I think the development really missed the point with this one.  The whole reason to have a glory hole in the first place is that you don't know who is on the other side of it.  On the service side, all you are presented with is a penis with no face to put it together with.  Doing it here has already made that one essential element invalid.  I really wish they would pay some more attention to the 3some poses, rather than coming up with this kind of pose.    :-

                              i think that to give the “spirit” of the glory hole in achat , it will need to have access to a kind of random room invitation , then the partner avi stay unvisible , and , when the parner talk , replace his/her name by “? ? ? ?”  ;D

                              So i think this pose will never have the spirit of the glory hole and will stay a sex pose like others i suppose  ;)

                              You had hit the point, girls…..
                              maybe, a way to make it work properly as it will be in real, is to create for group play and set the cam in first view mode before selecting it. the problem about the name on the chat remian, i know……..and honestly, i don't know a better way to solve it then the one suggested by Rukya

                              #68364
                              christinak
                              Participant

                                Well like I said, it's a matter of perspective.  If you know who you are going into the room with, then the whole point is lost.  The 3some might work.  I like Bear's idea of folding it into some kind of role play but I'll have to reserve any further judegment until I've had a chance to try it under those circumstances.

                                #68365
                                chien_lubrik
                                Participant

                                  Hello all kind peoples of the DreamWorld's Forum

                                  Well, I agree Miss Christinak, the “Glory Hole” all  interest is to take care of completely unknown peoples.
                                  With the invitation acceptance for entering room … it is strange, even if accepting everybody for Glory Hole.

                                  I also think, but that is only my point of view, that “Glory Hole” is mostly a gay ( men ) activity. And then it had been developed for F/M ???

                                  Is that “Glory Hole”'s pose have been asked previously or discussed ? I was not able to see topics about it before it was released…

                                  Well, in spite the development Team have made a great job technically ( I think ), the whole pose seem to have no place ( for me , only my point of view ) to be outside an “Open user” system ( a system where peoples may just “join” ).
                                  And my !!! There are so many poses to adapt and develop for other relations than F/M … I don't understand this release.

                                  I had tried it, and, yes the display is nice, and the choice of actions are kind of fun. But it didn't grant me the pleasure and enjoyment some other poses may give to me.

                                  I Rate it : ***

                                  Please accept my best humbly regards

                                Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 32 total)
                                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

                                Optimizing new Forum... Try it, and report bugs to support.

                                The forums Woman with man in AChat MF Pose Review REQUEST. 73. Glory Hole