Skip to content

MF Pose Review REQUEST. 73. Glory Hole

- Not logged in to forum -

Home Forums Woman with man in AChat MF Pose Review REQUEST. 73. Glory Hole

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 33 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #68350
    Upstecher
    Participant

    Hi all,

    i see the new Glory Hole Pose, buy it, use it and LOVE it !
    Thanks !!!

    #68351
    christinak
    Participant

    I think the development really missed the point with this one.  The whole reason to have a glory hole in the first place is that you don't know who is on the other side of it.  On the service side, all you are presented with is a penis with no face to put it together with.  Doing it here has already made that one essential element invalid.  I really wish they would pay some more attention to the 3some poses, rather than coming up with this kind of pose.   

    #68352
    kittenlepurr
    Participant

    or better yet comeout with more shoes

    #68353
    christinak
    Participant

    SHOES!!

    tumblr_lcy7rmQy5T1qfoo7bo1_500.jpg

    #68354
    Rukya
    Participant

    i think that to give the “spirit” of the glory hole in achat , it will need to have access to a kind of random room invitation , then the partner avi stay unvisible , and , when the parner talk , replace his/her name by “? ? ? ?” 

    So i think this pose will never have the spirit of the glory hole and will stay a sex pose like others i suppose 

    #68355
    Bear
    Participant

    It's use will be in RP… the right scnario can be set up can make it work… blind encounters…which a person is just going to have to let the imagination roll with. The imagination is really what this place is all about, setting aside the little inconsitencies in favor of the minds eye of the encounter. Taken as a straight forward pose, it just won't have the same effect.

    I can scene with this… just as it is…the use will be a bit limited though

    #68356
    christinak
    Participant

    Very limited….not woth the effort in a virtual environment IMO.

    #68357
    Azrielle
    Participant

    SHoes? Did someone say SHOES!

    Where? How Much?… and are they on sale?

    hehehehe… ok, we better not start a stampeed towards the shop… after all, the peeps all linin gup to buy the Glory hole pose may just be inexplicably diverted, and we wouldn't want to disappoint the dev team for their efforts…

    Do I sound just a wee bit feciscious? Good… lolz.

    Mwah!
    Az.

    #68358
    sm3369
    Participant

    Very sad that they did not make this available for the shemale members like myself.    Just my two cents here!!!!

    #68359
    Rukya
    Participant

    about clothes you dont have to worry , shemales and women are equal to this point  . For the poses , when the LGBT team will come back from vacations i'm sure they will do this pose for you and for MM too ( for the ones who are interessed ) . And this is the question .

    How many shemales or homos will buy this pose if dev team do it for you ?

    #68360
    sm3369
    Participant

    about clothes you dont have to worry , shemales and women are equal to this point  . For the poses , when the LGBT team will come back from vacations i'm sure they will do this pose for you and for MM too ( for the ones who are interessed ) . And this is the question .

    How many shemales or homos will buy this pose if dev team do it for you ?

    Thank you for your reply Rukya. This is only one example here of how I feel that we (shemales) are always getting the short end of the stick. Not too long ago there were other poses created that we never got. Example-The talking pose. Where you can sit with your partner & talk. This was never made available for FS.  For me, it would be important to have this. This is why sometimes I feel that the developers aren't interested in helping the shemales out here. And it bugs the heck out of me that I pay the same fees as someone who gets twice as many poses as me.

    Just my two cents…..

    #68361
    Lover
    Participant

    Back to the pose…

    Some month ago I had the idea of a glory hole. It was bit for fun, bit for rp, bit for something different from the exisiting ones.

    Some things are made very well. The kissing action, the fucking(if you like anal) and fingering, the licking head. But some are also very silly (IMO), slap ass, grab wall, hit the wall… Sex also is fun, perhaps this is more for fun then sex?
    If you do some special RP it might be a good choice. For example visiting a swinger club, sex on a public toilet…
    The wall reminds me of my soldier times – we had to climb ober those walls and I had to  laugh when my ava grabbed it. I tried to climb over at once, lol.

    It's not useful for usual play in room. But at least, Az and I had lots of fun in trying it

    #68362
    Bear
    Participant

    That is probably the best way to look at the use of this pose… as something fun to play with in certain RP settings.

    For that it fits the bill..

    #68363
    hentaiboy69
    Participant

    I think the development really missed the point with this one.  The whole reason to have a glory hole in the first place is that you don't know who is on the other side of it.  On the service side, all you are presented with is a penis with no face to put it together with.  Doing it here has already made that one essential element invalid.  I really wish they would pay some more attention to the 3some poses, rather than coming up with this kind of pose.   

    i think that to give the “spirit” of the glory hole in achat , it will need to have access to a kind of random room invitation , then the partner avi stay unvisible , and , when the parner talk , replace his/her name by “? ? ? ?” 

    So i think this pose will never have the spirit of the glory hole and will stay a sex pose like others i suppose 

    You had hit the point, girls…..
    maybe, a way to make it work properly as it will be in real, is to create for group play and set the cam in first view mode before selecting it. the problem about the name on the chat remian, i know……..and honestly, i don't know a better way to solve it then the one suggested by Rukya

    #68364
    christinak
    Participant

    Well like I said, it's a matter of perspective.  If you know who you are going into the room with, then the whole point is lost.  The 3some might work.  I like Bear's idea of folding it into some kind of role play but I'll have to reserve any further judegment until I've had a chance to try it under those circumstances.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 33 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Optimizing new Forum... Try it, and report bugs to support.