Home › Forums › Share your creative ideas › Pregnant customization
- This topic has 189 replies, 47 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 11 months ago by Michelle989.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 17, 2012 at 1:23 pm #48416AderaParticipant
Hiya's…
I don't know about this. For me, I think if they start involving children in the game, either fantasy, role play, in the womb or out, I would leave the game.
Thanks for letting me share,
PafeIn this case I get the image that people are after the sexual aspects of pregnancy… not the children part. As long as it was optional for females and not unethical I wouldn't mind it since there are those that would like it.
I hope they are not serious too, Adera!
Even, well, i can imagine this is an experience really important for a woman and maybe you had dream about it. Maybe i'm entering on a too personal aspect of your life, so forgive me, please
Oh, it doesn't upset me, I have long since come to terms with the fact that I wont be able to bear children myself.
February 18, 2012 at 5:16 am #48417RukyaParticipantits must be a good experience , but in real , not in a game
March 30, 2012 at 7:48 pm #48404islandsunParticipantI feel pregnancy does`nt belong here> thats a touchy topic for me ,
And hope it was a joke but some guy or kid said he was 12 here and he doest it w his step mom that was a while back and almost made me sick……… :'(
June 21, 2012 at 7:43 pm #5749ShiannaParticipantThis is sort of out of the box for me, since I'm a shemale. But I've gotten curious of prego fetish, and I thought of ways it could be implemented into Achat. I know this has been suggested before so I'll keep it short and sweet.
Here's a detailed summary:
– A new abdomen section will be available in the body options for females, there are two primary choices: Not pregnant and pregnant. Pregnant will have two sub-choices: mid and large.
– Certain positions will be inaccessible unless the pregnant partner does away with the body option. (as it would look totally wrong doing something like anal doggy or from behind against the wall.
– It would inspire more styles of the receiver being on top
– It would also inspire more descriptive RP.
– Gives a neat perspective of sex.
That's all for now
June 21, 2012 at 8:18 pm #65643TightFit74ParticipantThanks for the suggestion Shianna, the subject has been talked about a number of time before. there seems to be no real consensus about a yes or no. Most would agree it adds to an rp experience, but a lot deny the idea.
As an option, which has merit in my eyes, would be an to offer it as a body option, something you put on like a dress, or panties. Something that wasn't mentioned, if memory serves me right, was the fact thqat most clothes woulf not be able to be worn, as the they are 'layered' around the standard avatar model. It might only be possible in sex clothing..
June 21, 2012 at 8:32 pm #65644ShiannaParticipantI figured as much for the clothes, it does seem to be quite a bit of work considering you'll have to change all of the models.
June 21, 2012 at 8:45 pm #65645hentaiboy69Participantit will be interessing for peoples who like it, probably and about clothes, Tight is perfectly right: whit new body mesh, we need new option for the clothes (the one who can work whit pregnant siloutte) or some new one!
maybe, we never gonna have this, but dreaming of it is not a bad thing! Shianna , really thank you to put this suggestion up again!
June 26, 2012 at 7:19 pm #65646LuctorParticipantIt might be something to add.
I have already got a question from a girl who asked if it was possible to get pregnant in this game. With this option she would.
June 27, 2012 at 12:42 pm #65647RukyaParticipantbe pregnant in game will make some poses really useless ( all foreplay ones ) . in these ones the hand of someone caressing the stomach will be inside the body , caressing dirrectly the baby
June 27, 2012 at 12:46 pm #65648LoverParticipant@ Rukya: LOL… get a pic in my mind of fondling a baby
Then we also need a birth control pill or more condoms – I don't wanna become a dad in game
This option needs a lot of reprogramming and I don't see it in the moment. But computer and software are still in (fast) progress and with AChat 2.0 or 3.0…
A possible solution for clothes is to offer prego clothes – long and wide (large) dresses e.g.June 27, 2012 at 12:57 pm #65649PafeParticipantHiya's…
Good grief Rukya, yes! I never considered that. Might as well turn the “fisting” pose into a “delivery” pose.
Thanks for letting me share,
PafeJune 27, 2012 at 4:04 pm #65650chien_lubrikParticipantOhhhh My !!!
… Might as well turn the “fisting” pose into a “delivery” pose …
I have no fetish nor lust about Pregnant women. But I think they are really beautiful … but this is just a matter of aesthetic ( and maybe about a dream to be able to be … )
But having sexual intercourses with … that disturbed me a bit in fact …
I think of course Miss Pafe was kidding, but I get the mentaly picture of it … :-XAlso a problem I think about is … what will happen to the baby's Avatar ??? Just forget about it in the DreamWorld ??
Either for roleplay or for matching an actually real situation ( Maybe Miss Azrielle may tell us the feeling she have about it ) and even with pose limitation for pregnant peoples. I think that will lead for frustrating situations … But that is only what I think about it.
Please accept my best humbly regards
June 27, 2012 at 4:25 pm #65651kittenlepurrParticipantits a nice idea Shianna. but honestly one that I would never take even if it was an option.
December 17, 2012 at 10:59 am #48418Patricia1975ParticipantHi sweeties.
I had an idea , but still im not sure. You all tell me!. What about, if a spouse relation ,Min. 1 year,with the same spouse, you could have the chance to show our avatar pregnant, from that relation? As a gift , for so long relation? And we could take it out , the pregnant belly if we like?
Dont get me wrong…its just an idea Achat fans
Hope see coments…..good or wrong.Yours……..Patricia1975
December 17, 2012 at 11:17 am #48419RukyaParticipantLike for the previous proposition , my coment is we dont need it . We dont need to caress directly the “baby” when we caress the belly , cause its what will happen
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Optimizing new Forum... Try it, and report bugs to support.