Public Rooms for Voyeurs and Sex in Public Places

[wildflower]

PUBLIC ROOMS FOR VOYEURS AND SEX IN PUBLIC PLACES

I can imagine it gives many people they like to peeping… and others they like to have sex in public places. May it gives good ideas for it.

Greetings Daniela

[aquiles]

Hi everybody, this is my first post and hope it wont be the last one

Those are my suggestions. I think it would be great to have the ability to invite other people to the room just to watch and chat, or at least have all couple poses available when we are in a group session, what you think? will it be hard to develop in the game?

Sorry for my english. See you in the chat!

[Ramrod29]

This Idea does have potential and I could see it becoming popular. I  just think there would be programming issues, in going from watching to joining in.

[Anonymous]

I don't know for sure but it sounds like a programming nightmare to me.  Too many people in the room would be a distraction.  I'm fine with 3.  If other people are in the room chatting while I'm having sex with a girl, NO WAY.  WAY too distracting.  And what happens when one of the watchers gets bored and wants to leave the room?  The whole session ends and you would have to start all over again.  Sorry, not a good idea.

[Lover]

Welcome aquiles,enjoy AChat and have fun here in forum!

It could be possible to have a 3rd person inside the room, just watching, as two other people are having fun. That might be no problem, though bobbler is right – the session ends if the voyeur leaves the room. I personally don't need this, but I can imagine, others might have fun.

If you want a room where more people are able to chat, this is a wish that is asked a lot here.

I am sure the A-Team won't give all 2some positions to the 3-some, as they have the extra positions for that.

[sinnnn]

Welcome Babes. ;D

Now I will repeat my suggestion about voyeurs.

You know how hospitals have those viewing rooms in the operation rooms. Why don’t they have something like that. If you want to be watched you go to a “operation room” . You can have the option of “Open” or “Close”, where ppl can join or can’t enter at all. Now you can also place the limit ppl in the room.
Now for the “Viewing” room. PPl can come in chat with one another or just watch the “Show” without disturbing the “performers”. Now it should be something they should click on to be able to see what the “performers” are saying. That way if a watcher leaves it won’t end the game.

But I’m not a computer geek, so I don’t know what it will take to get that to work. Just throwing my idea out there. 😉

[Janine Dee]

If they made a viewing “room” that could at least spare the “performers” BUT that would still mean if there was more then one viewer they would have to close and restart a viewing room any time someone wanted to leave.

I do think it would be the better option though it would prevent any join in options.

As far as the “viewing” in viewing room? Honestly I'm not sure, for security reasons they would probably want to run the video feed through some sort of security coding to keep the viewers from using it to convince the AChat system they are one of the performers (aka hacking the account)…

Okay, sadly the more I think about it the more I think it will be a later or never kind of concept.

[mikki]

My own two cents worth here. If you are not an active participant in the scene, you've got no business there. I will never ever be caught in one of these viewing rooms if they ever appear. This would be too much like a porn film for my taste. Mind you, I have nothing against a goo porn flick occasionally, I just don't want to be in one. I like to keep my fun between those involved only. Any ways that all I have to say on that.

[sinnnn]

To each his own, no ones making anyone do anything or asking you too.

True Janine. But you should be able to leave out of a room without all being ejected. When you play on-line games, you leave and the gamers are not disturb. Oh well life. Not going to bang my head trying to figure it out unless I know they are going to do it.

:-

[Janine Dee]

Where I'm coming from Darling is that the design as is has anyone leaving a room closing the room, and as it stands it's a good mechanism. SO and so (and so) enter a room, they are keeping it open with their presence, the variable changes (someone leaves) the room that they created no longer exists.

They would basically have to rewrite what I'm guessing is a fairly fundamental dynamic. Which means that it would be a much larger implement if ever.

The security concerns would only make it worse. (If you would be viewing my room you would see either my video feed or a partners, and since they are adjustable that says to me each one gets one… more could just be made or would it be duplicated? A duplication could lead to hacking concerns… basically actually contemplating the complexities makes me realize how big a job it is.)

[sinnnn]

Thats why I’m no longer thinking bout it. Computer stuff makes my eyes cross. :P>

[Janine Dee]

Fair enough, but when asking things of the development team I like to try to think of it from their side and how hard it would or would not be to make it happen.

[sinnnn]

True, Treue, But it still doesn’t hurt to put it out there. Sometimes you just never know. An idea might be to large to make happen, but it doesn’t mean that can’t get a small idea from a large one and make something great. 😉

[Janine Dee]

And I'm not an expert. It could be far easier then I imagine.

[aquiles]

I am sure the A-Team won't give all 2some positions to the 3-some, as they have the extra positions for that.

Why?

Lets forget the spectators issue, but i insist in 2-some positions during 3somes. 3some poses are very few, they dont give much options and i think it wont be very dificult to implement.

[Author]

Posts