Game Idea. Robot Girl / Boy have All the Poses to try before buy.

[apollo13nut]

Robot Girl/Boy All Poses (Blue Star)?

So, I was reading through the forum (started on page 13 and worked backwards)….and found a post about selling back unwanted items, specifically sexual poses.

I for one would love to sell back the 2 m-f poses that involve male anal (girl with strap on and girl with dildo, which I see was the “original” blowjob position according to the forum).

In that post about selling poses back (which I agree, won’t happen), a person suggests giving ALL positions to robot girl/boy as created, which I think is a great idea and lets people test positions for buying.

So, to see how people feel about this, I am adding a poll. Please add comments as well

[Janine Dee]

I've yet to want to sell back a position, but I have had that happen with some of the wardrobe choices.

Thinking about it just now however I realized why they might not allow it.

What would stop people from buying something, using it, and then returning it when done? They want to use it again, they buy it again, etc, etc, etc.

At the very least a return system would require a secondary list of stuff you already bought once  so that you couldn't “rent” it like that.

I liked the idea of every wardrobe choice being available while offline so you could see how they looked, but you needed to buy them to use them on AChat.

Having all the positions with the Robot Boy and Girl could run into a similar problem with the people who just want to get off doing so on the cheap with ALL the positions available.

As it is I would say I haven't even regretted 1/10th of the stuff I've bought so I can't call the problem big enough to require a fix, but that's my A$ .02.

[Lover]

I agree to everything Janine said.
The most important reason they won't do this is to keep people away only to have fun with the robots. Sure, it's not funny to buy something and then seeing you don't like it. But the costs are very low and you also can read/ask this forum before you buy a new scene that it's not really a big problem.

[Carli]

I think the current system is already very gentle on the users, since you can play for free somewhat and a subscription is very reasonably priced. If you can sell back items/poses, or even just choose them up to your purchased amount, the income from the shop for AChat would decrease. They would have to compensate that with increasing the subscription fee. Personally, I prefer the low subscription fee.

[Anonymous]

The only change I would like concerning this is to try out threesomes with the robots freely. Let them both be tagged as premium members and make it possible to invite two of the same robot to be able to try out all positions you've bought before finding people for it.

[Janine Dee]

I could agree with that. Since blue star does not have to mean you have all the positions.

I would even say having Robo 1 and Robo 2 for the Boy and Girl so you can have two bots of the same gender for group sex. (Like FFF in my case.)

[sinnnn]

I think they should have all the positions, that way I can try them out before I buy.

[Dannyello]

Should robots have all positions open. Anyway, there's satisfaction to have sex with a partner who is not involved. But the preview positions, the robots should have all positions open.

[Marion]

3-some poses should only be available for people which have them already.
(Because sometimes it's hard to find “Mr/ Ms. Right” for a nice threesome)
But the poses should not be available for everyone, because otherwise there is no need to buy them, if I can use them with robots!

This includes automatically the answer for 2-some poses. => NO, because  all non-blue-star-user could use the poses without paying for them!

Kisses, Marion. :-*

[sinnnn]

I don't like to fuck the braindead.  Thats what the robots are like for me, I go in the room just to try out the positions so I can post my thoughts on them.  So i can understand your thoughts on not offering the whole positions to the robots because non-members will get to try them out an might not buy.  But like I said you can only get sooo much out of the four sentences Ken and Barbie.  You also have to look at it this way, why should non-members buy when they have us to woo. So its the samething.

How bout just offering all the positions to members, so that way we can try them out before we buy.  Hell if I could have tried out that stupid worm position I would have never purchased it.  Hmmmm just thought of a new thread.

[Janine Dee]

Because then they have to at least “play the game” enough to woo. Otherwise they could log on grab Barbie or Ken, get off, and go.

[sinnnn]

True Janine.  I guess I'm looking at it in my own point of view.  I don't use the Ken/Barbie because they are sooo boring to screw, I need interaction.  Keep forgetting you have some that like to screw the blow-up doll. 

[Lover]

What about building a “worm”? This worm searches for user who ask/expext gifts and A$. If they find them (what is not difficult) they automatically are together in a room. Of course, in this room the users are allowed to negotiate. Perhaps the robots will pay? If not, bad luck…

[Anonymous]

I agree with Bouli 

[apollo13nut]

Hmmmm, what if the idea of “open” positions was limited? Like they release a position (say a MF) on the 20th of the month, the next position is out on the 24th…..so with if position A (the 20th release date) is available until position b, then de-activated, giving a 4 day trial before purchase? and since it's only on the “Ken” and “Barbie” as they were referred, less code on the dev team?

[Author]

Posts