The forums › Events › TRADING FACES FOR MORE EMBRACES
- This topic has 62 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 2 months ago by islandsun.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 25, 2012 at 6:21 pm #5636
Hiya's…
As it's been noted elsewhere, we've been wondering if it would be possible for the Developers to include more hugging in every pose. Maybe drop some of the “pleasure” faces (which usually give me pleasure to laugh at) and include more embraces. We've come up with a little saying
Thanks to Azrielle for this:
Trading Faces For More Embraces!
Since I'm at it… More Hugs, Less Mugs!
Also, I would be more than willing to trade faces for being able to kiss. Especially in those poses where one of us can already kiss. Sometimes I want to be the one to initiate the kissing and some kissing and even MORE kissing. Can you tell I love kissing? Now we just need a clever saying for that.Thanks for letting me share,
PafeP.S. My apologies to the developers, I know there is a lot of hard work you do to make everything here possible, I don't mean to make fun of your endeavors. Forgive me, please.
March 25, 2012 at 6:30 pm #61775TRADING FACES for MORE EMBRACES
I fully support the Movement!
Mwah!
Az.March 25, 2012 at 6:41 pm #61776Missing the kissing .. ??
Wherever we can get more holding, hugs, cuddling and kissing in a pose, I'm all for it … You have my backing.
Poses, – PLEASEEEEEE ACHAT add a cuddle and a kiss to the Foreplay pose on the bed.
Replace ” Lick lips” in “Doggy”
Replace at least 2 “pleasure faces” in “From behind”
Replace the fart action in ” Licking from behind “I'm sure there's more … I'll list as I find and remember or I'm sure other members will
TRADING FACES FOR MORE EMBRACES
MUGS FOR HUGS
MISSING THE KISSINGGo Girls and Guys GO
March 25, 2012 at 6:57 pm #61777Trading faces *clap* for more embraces *clap clap*
Mugs for hugs *clap clap*
We miss *clap* the kisses *clap clap*
Go girls! *clap*
Go guys! *clap*
Go!
Wooo!Sorry, I couldn't hold back when I saw Brandybee's post.
March 25, 2012 at 7:12 pm #61778TRADING FACES FOR MORE EMBRACES
MUGS FOR HUGS
MISSING THE KISSINGGo Girls and Guys GO
Whoot!
I concur… Pafe and I had a discussion… how about:
Miss da Kiss
(makes it sound like a person's name)Mwah!
Az.March 25, 2012 at 7:33 pm #61779dont dream the pleasure faces are here and will never be erased . And another “pantless friday” like topic is not for me . I still dont understand why the pantless friday was made
March 25, 2012 at 7:42 pm #61780oh rukya… ye of little faith… pay this no attention then
i like the idea, and i will dream for more cuddle moments in all the poses
and Pafie… only you could make a post with an insult and an apology in it.
(((((Pafe)))))March 25, 2012 at 9:46 pm #61781A for pity's sake, please PUH LEASE, I BEG of you.
Get rid of every version of “Tongue Play”
I would gladly trade that face for an embrace, or a kiss, or a mere fondle.
March 26, 2012 at 10:35 am #61782Girls, your request have so many point, but honestly we can't have hug and kiss in every poses, cause there are someone where it will be a bit ridicolous. We can presume we have poses who are merely sex oriented, rough sometimes, and i don't think a kiss will suit them….oh, well, maybe if we think on a good way to add them maybe yes…
I'm looking at the “punished boy”, when the girl have a crop in her hand: maybe, here can be added a “forced” kiss action, when the girl grab the boy's hair and force him to kiss or maybe others. This is just an idea, so dunno if it's good or not.
March 26, 2012 at 2:56 pm #61774youre true hentai , we cant have cuddles and kisses to each poses . In same way , we can easyly exchange the bad tongue out moves for another move
March 26, 2012 at 4:15 pm #61783Probably true HB, we can't have it everywhere. But more often as we do have now. As long as there is place for adding kisses I gladly would have it. And when there is no more room left, I also would trade some of these faces versus more kissing.
Zinah, I like some versions of the tongue play
March 26, 2012 at 4:45 pm #61784Not a question of room, Lover…..it's about the pose itself, or better say about his nature.
March 26, 2012 at 4:57 pm #61785Either I'm very confused today – or you are HB, lol… my first sentence was to your post “Probably true HB, we can't have it everywhere.” I am talking about the poses, as you are
March 26, 2012 at 5:00 pm #61786Of course….we are talking of the same thing. and i want make you notice better i was talking about the nature of a pose…then, yes, space for option can become a proble sometimes
March 26, 2012 at 5:07 pm #61787why ? when there will be no more room there will just need to add one column and hide the moves
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Optimizing new Forum... Try it, and report bugs to support.
The forums › Events › TRADING FACES FOR MORE EMBRACES