Voyeur Rooms

[jasmine_t]

Mmmm…. 3 to 5 partners gangbang would be very cool to have

😀 , but most probably after some long time yet :'(

[amanda2860]

i would just love having 3-5 men working on me 🙂

[Brandybee]

Hi  amanda,

Interesting concept. It wouldn't be possible in Achat game at the moment but we have the erotic story section here, if you could find guys who wouldn't mind role playing with you.

TightFit74, Stone Jayc and I did a foursome in The Ice House as part of a storyline there.
Stone actually turned it into a Stand Alone Story later on in Literotica.

Forum Home Page > Discussions about sex > Erotic Stories > The Ice House **AB&G Dungeon**

Start Post 81 with Tightfit74  on Page 6 (https://funnyadultgamesplay.com/forum/index.php/topic,1841.75.html)  and finally ends Stones post 220  on Page 15.  ( https://funnyadultgamesplay.com/forum/index.php/topic,1841.210.html )

Secrets of the Stallion. by Stone_Rhine.
http://www.literotica.com/stories/memberpage.php?uid=1574118&page=submissions

You could perhaps try it as a role play with its own topic or maybe fit it in the AB&G Fantasy bar as one of the story lines in there. This is  also in the erotic story section.

Heres a bit about The AB&G & Ice House

Forum Home Page > Organizations & Events > Introduce yourself > Old_Joe
https://funnyadultgamesplay.com/forum/index.php/topic,2810.0.html

Just a thought   

[Vaughan]

I'll second it. Its a cool idea and I would certainly use it.

[Anonymous]

I too find this idea erotic and highly arousing. The possibilities only limited by our imaginations.

For me…. the “turn-on” currently taking over my thoughts….putting on a peep show for the one I LOVE. This would appeal to those here, like me,  that really get to know their lover, their turn-ons, their limits and gives us an opportunity to demonstrate just how we can press those buttons through a real-time peep show. Plus…. the additional benefit is the Voyeur can be hands free, watching the show and listening to the lust as they have two hands to pleasure themselves. No stress, no distractions. What better gift to give to your special lover.

As I consider how this might play out… I can think of some optional settings that would enhance the experience and provide additional options.

Such as:

     – provide visibility of the voyeur excitement meter to the participants
       or
     – allow communication by the voyeur as an option setting: YES / NO
     

     – allow for a standard “Voyeur” mode only
        or
     – allow pose selection and control to be selected: Voyeur or Participants, providing passive or active pleasure.

A “Blind Voyeur” version of this idea also gets my juices flowing, where the Voyeur is unknown. But, I can see how this feature could be exploited by those that want to cause grief.  Sadly…. but I am still aroused by the idea 

[rosa_latece]

YESSSSSSSS!

THAT WOULD BE TOTALLY WICKED!  And the voyeur guy can jump on me when the main guy leaves the room

[Gigi__1]

A “Blind Voyeur” version of this idea also gets my juices flowing, where the Voyeur is unknown. But, I can see how this feature could be exploited by those that want to cause grief.  Sadly…. but I am still aroused by the idea 

I wonder if the voyeur idea might work as a pay-per-view feature.

First, I would enter in a number in my personal settings, the number of A$ I am willing to accept as a fee for letting a voyeur watch, while I am in a room.  (If left blank, it means I am unwilling to be on exhibit.)  Accompanying the A$ amount is a second number, the number of minutes that comprises a “show”, for example 600 $, 12 minutes.

While in the room with my lover, I might get a pop-up message “SnoddyRoddy will pay 600 A$ to watch you and “

I'll have a choice of three buttons, “Accept”, “Reject”, or “Reject All”.  (“Reject All” stops any further solicitations).

Only one voyeur may watch.

If the show continues, for at least 12 minutes, I get a “Transaction Successful” message.  300 $ for me, and 300 for the partner.

If the voyeur leaves, before the 12 minutes, he still must pay.

The show may continue, for as long as all parties are willing.

The voyeur may not hear the conversation.  (Maybe this one could be a configurable option.)

I think it's a win-win-win.

The voyeur receives a private show.  The exhibitionists will receive pay.  AChat will benefit from increased A$ purchases.

[Elle_C]

Currently, public sex in Summer or the streets (too snowy in winter!  brrrr!) is the perfect voyeur room. You can watch or be watched, and perhaps take over if somebody leaves!

Of course, you never know if a friend is going to walk in on you, and be absolutely shocked by your wild behavior…

Unfortunately, in the current implementation, public sex has a lot of limitations, including:

• no orgasms
  no speed controls
  furniture that materializes or dematerializes
  inability to use outdoor objects as props
  coding problems that can cause massive client slow-down, even on the fastest of machines and graphics cards

• [/list]

  Therefore, allowing residents of a room to turn on or off a voyeur control, would be nice. I would suggest that once voyeur is on, the participants get an invite interface that allows them to invite either…
  (1) someone, by name,  into the room. That person is visually present and can chat with those in the room. … or…
  (2) anyone. Those people can only see the action and read the chat, they are not visibly present.

[nehakaina]

Totally agree with it..hope we get to do this in future

[Author]

Posts