Navigation Menu

[apollo13nut]

Ah, good point Bear, thank you. There's another thread out there that they were discussing things like stuffed animals that girls can hold in their character editor poses, but they can only get those animals from gifts (cannot be bought in shop directly).

And it doesn't have to be limited to just stuffed animals. There could be flowers, special “gift only” clothing (for example something like the french maid outfit) but girls can't buy it, someone has to send it to them as a gift.

This takes out the A$ exchange to some degree.

[apollo13nut]

Tablet version?

I know it was suggested a while back to make a cell phone version and that idea was rejected…however with the advent of tablets (iPad and others), I wonder if anyone else would be interested in seeing the achat client for these tablets (in the case of Apple, restrict it to iPad only so it’s not on the iPhone).

Any thoughts, ideas, concerns?

[apollo13nut]

Also making this a poll….we all know how the Dev Team doesn't always read posts, but they can't ignore a poll as easily

[apollo13nut]

“I love AChat” filter work-around

Okay, I was reading some posts and I read one about the “I Love AChat” filter they’ve been doing to our profiles IN CLIENT!

I put the “in client” part because if you come to the website and search for the person and read their profile here, IT SHOWS THEIR REAL DESCRIPTION. Yes, I realize it is a lot of work, but if you really want to know what they are trying to say, it helps.

[apollo13nut]

Someone else suggested this a while back. I think they put it to a vote and it was like 1 yes and all no's

[apollo13nut]

This is now fixed with a new update (11:57AM EST 2/27/2011) so YAY! Thanks Dev Team!

[apollo13nut]

I thought it was just me. This is indeed annoying. Maybe a shut down/relaunch will help? If you already tried that, then it may need a patch.

[apollo13nut]

The admin/dev team have to be involved. Anyone, try leaving your age blank in your profile  (it'll tell you that you must enter your age)….this “thing” has no age, so the admin team must have given it an override somehow (or that is why “it” constantly goes “offline”)

[apollo13nut]

OK, so I know this thread was a poll to see what people thought of the duration of the orgasm meter, but I have a serious inquiry: When it was the old “squirt” button, free users could use it? So why now do all of us need to be members to orgasm? If none of you have been with a free user, they can only max out to the threshold; their character cannot orgasm without becoming a premium user….the only reason I disagree with this is cause the old squirt button was open to free users. Maybe it's better in a different topic with it's own poll.

[apollo13nut]

So, I noticed the admin team has yet to weigh in. Any word on if it's a glitch, a bug, a virus, or just some ass having too much free time? It's very odd that something so strange would remain under wraps instead of out in the open with some explanation….

[apollo13nut]

Well, I concede to you Janine Dee. You are very right, it is like saying “Hi, I'm an asshole” True, the 4 or whatever left is a smaller pool, but there is a better chance of a better connection with someone in that pool (if not all). Gives me a new way to look at it. Though I will admit, it does sometimes hurt to remove someone from friend/lover because the decide to post something like that on their profile (and when I say remove, I mean they post something about someone else, which to me is not a friend worth keeping).

[apollo13nut]

Sounds like a wonderful idea, bobbler! Being a broke college student, I don't know what I could afford, but still sounds great.

[apollo13nut]

I feel some of this discussion got derailed.

I originally posted this because some person had the nerve to tell me that the game is own or be owned and that is the only way to play. I am with Lover for the most part. If you agree to own/be owned, fine. But DO NOT tell me that is how i must play because I will leave in a heartbeat if that is the “ONLY” way to play.

I joined to make friends, meet people, have fun, not be dictated to by some narrow minded bitch that think she runs the damn show. I have people like fighter that feel the need to own all the girls on ignore. The problem I'm running into: there's not many people left to play with. If there are 100 people at a party (if I'm part of the 100, then there are 99 for me to mingle with). If one of those 99 decides to “own” 96, that means there are only 3 for me to mingle with. That is the part I have the BIG issue with.

Think of poker. If I were to remove the kings, queens, and jacks before dealing, that would be called “cheating”….but doing something similar here is considered “the only way to play” by far more than I realized.

Janine Dee, this is not a thread about stopping the own/be owned thing. This thread is more of a complaint about people like fighter that feel the need to try to own everyone else and have the nerve to tell me either play his way or leave. I'd rather see him banned, but since technically he did not violate the TOS, I can't do anything to him.

[apollo13nut]

I just wanted to vent. For an example, it's like religion….There are many out there and they all claim to be the only true one….I don't really care but I hate people telling me how and who to worship. So people saying the only way to play the game is to own or be owned piss me off.

As for the ignore stuff, I don't really care. If they feel that's the only way to play, then as said, they are not worth knowing. And as much as I would LOVE to suggest banning the practice, I know it won't happen….

Anyway, I figured this would be a good place to vent and see other people's thoughts on the issue.

[apollo13nut]

Now if only there was a translator or support to copy and paste Google Translator into the client

[Author]

Posts