Skip to content

Bear

- Not logged in to forum -

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,281 through 2,295 (of 3,798 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Chat #42497
    Bear
    Participant

    well social room might be an interesting add, but the current setup does not open itself for much in the way of fluid movement, and any actions would create a rather choppy reload. But chat rooms like sitting at a round bar with others, a hot tub, maybe a balcony setting with a cluster of standing people drinks in hand for chat purposes would be interesting. Perhaps a themed setting, 3somes orientation, mm, ff, oriented rooms..controlled by a host with the ability to monitor the room and have right of booting the obnoxious. Then there are issues of the ignored function, wiil those on the list have the capacity to interact with another?

    I liked the general chat thread when they experimented with it.  It would be nice to see a universal chat system reinstated. One of the problems had been the other channels they offered were hardly used. I think the experiment was cut off too soon. Perhaps Suzy can inform us of the why of the shut down, I am rather curious…

    in reply to: Pantless Fridays! Protest! #50842
    Bear
    Participant

    Well I am pantless until I return again on a more consistent basis. Thanks to all who keep this going.

    Bear
    Participant

    Lots of good ideas Cat keep them coming.

    in reply to: COMPLETE Vote for pose idea to be developed #52569
    Bear
    Participant

    Lotus position:

    Male kneeling on the bed, female sitting on his penis facing him , (anal or vaginal options) with her legs wrapped around his hips.
    Options of movement speed, should include hip rotation for her.
    obvious caresses..shoulder, back,face…and capacity to kiss neck, face and lips

    in reply to: MF. Pose Review – 178. F Pole Dance #52622
    Bear
    Participant

    Sounds interesting when I return to play again I will have to have that checked out.

    in reply to: Game Idea. Filter Option for Chat #52538
    Bear
    Participant

    Yes sex oriented, but there is still a high amount of social activity here. Many don't jump into sex without some degree of comfort and familiarity. Some more so than others.

    in reply to: Janine’s Soap Box: Juan Willam’s Whining #44452
    Bear
    Participant

    “Image” is something actually misinterpreted.  The Hebrew word I believe was “Bara”  which is “to fill…or filled” or … “formed” .Miscommonly interpreted as physical image from Hebrew to Greek to into to English . Hopefully whatever species is out there has that figured out and see us as something worthy to straighten out on that. The correct interpretation is to be “filled with his essence”.

    Dawkins is a tool…a forefront scientist who equate that knowledge is wisdom..incapable of bridging that in their roots they are totally  different concepts. Knowledge impart is different from understanding… which is different from wisdom.

    All science does is unravel the physical side of the universe.

    As I mathematician I now you have to define something to disprove it.  I was not aware “god ” had been defined in absolutes. All which has happen is that there is a failure of the definition.

    in reply to: Janine’s Soap Box: Juan Willam’s Whining #44449
    Bear
    Participant

    It was heavily debated before and long after.

    Thomas Jefferson was adamant on defending the right of an individual to have their own personal beliefs. Any atheist website which carries a Jefferson quote is selective and ignorant. When pressed by Christian groups about States rights years after the signing, Jefferson was  specific in reply that this nation should be welcoming to all regardless of beliefs. Jew, Muslim and Christian named specifically in his reply, though clear he meant to address all religions. He did not want the European concept that was prevalent  at the time of State Religions. He debated this with  John Adams (a devout man) for years, and one casual remark when they were discussion Calvinism, Adams asked him specially about Calvin and  God. Jefferson replied “I believe in God , just not his God.”

    The 14th amendment besides abolishing slavery, gave the right of an individual to live without persecution of his beliefs, and enforces the State to recognize that fact .

    Bear
    Participant

    Recipient poses for the shemales are indeed lacking…I always considered that odd.

    in reply to: Pantless Fridays! Protest! #50837
    Bear
    Participant

    Unfortunately, all the clothes which we have already “in stock”, will be added to the shop (as upgrades)

    Someone should try to focus on giving us what we have suggested as far as men's clothing and see how the sales numbers actually would improve. It's fine to add slip designs like these in occasionally… but this constant flow…  ???

    The Pantless Protest continues…I guess for many more months…

    in reply to: Refund. Should the shop have a “refund” system? #12161
    Bear
    Participant

    The Golf suit was at least a costume… this new add…

    I am opting out of this discussion of refunds.. because I am not an impulse buyer…

    in reply to: Pose Idea. Suggestion for post-play pose and actions #52494
    Bear
    Participant

    You are right Keiko… that pose could use a bit more modification to enhance it…a kiss is a wonderful start for them to consider in an update.

    in reply to: Game Idea. Filter Option for Chat #52533
    Bear
    Participant

    welcome Nympho” (why does that handle sound delicious  ::))

    Apollo is correct we talked of a few options that would be nice…a chat only filter certainly one of those. I doubt invisible mode will ever come to be…. it is too important to give a presence of numbers to attract new players. Perhaps an invisible mode on the sign in at least to respond to messages or change wardrobe, edit character…shop…but limits on actual interchange with members active would be likely.

    Certainly anyone with an understanding of the chat  flow would appreciate the fact you might not be able to respond to everyone. I t took a month for me to catch the attention of one person… and that led to a rather long and wonderfully intense relationship.

    Don't stress on the need to  satisfy everyone with a response. Find some selection in the situation and engage with those who truly interest you. If one irritates you,  ignore them… helps limit some of the pointless banter you have no interest in.

    in reply to: Pantless Fridays! Protest! #50830
    Bear
    Participant

    Indeed Alstott… they are the diamonds of achat…

    again many thanks to all for the support.

    in reply to: Pose Idea. Suggestion for post-play pose and actions #52492
    Bear
    Participant

    hmm… would suggest using woman on top pose and that playful kiss for that moment… a nice compromise for that moment here and now

    That post coitus period is under appreciated… nothing irritates me more then someone who just bails quick on the moment. That afterglow should be savored…

Viewing 15 posts - 2,281 through 2,295 (of 3,798 total)