Navigation Menu

[Bear]

Yes Unhealer, I think it would have appealed to a larger demographic of F-F or F-S…

[Bear]

. If i said the wrong thing, you'll have to find me and punish me.

Not the wisest thing to say to one who dabbles in extreme bdsm ,  whose idea of punishment might be much deeper then yours..

[Bear]

the problem with a ban is they would just create a new account..restricting Ip addresses to one account would hurt  those who play in multiple sexes, or play in multiple accounts. Some Players create a dedicated Av' for use with the intent of  one specific partner.

Free users are a necessity to keep a continual flow of partners…people come and go quickly here… partly because there isn't a true “WOW” offering that induces long term commitment to the premiums…the second largest population if the Bi' female community, the sweet jam for the bread and butter…focusing on better FF poses would induce them to stick around longer… and serve those like Janine who want to play but feel neglected by the development. (not to discount the shemale crowd…but that group offering is under developed imho for the numbers that are there.)

[Bear]

lol.. I would emphasis the invite declines…instead… that is the rudest of distractions just to assume.

[Bear]

hmmm our brief chat remind you of that eh?

[Bear]

mmm Lady_Kalima and sunny…thnk you for your support today..

But sunny.. not going to flash that cute bottom for us today?

[Bear]

I don't mind freebies,… but I think there needs to be a much wider separation of access to features between the two. A stronger incentive to make them pay would be enticing.

[Bear]

Banning seems severe… no warning shot across the bow to tone it down?

He provokes others with his behavior… some will react harshly and emotionally to his behavior. There is no other out there who constantly banners BY NAME  his feelings towards others.. Clearly this thread is filled with many references… and the numbers out there not posting here which would multiply that  immensely.

[Bear]

A pose like that would be read as submissive sunny. There are a number of subtle clues in the form of posturing… the head bowed down is the obvious sign of submission.

Extending the wrists crossed represents an offering…which  can be visually enhanced if a woman closes her eyes and raises her head up extending and exposing her neck. Such a posture is equivalent to absolute submission.. and offer to receive the collar…

Knees wide apart a sexual invitation…quite different from a submissive stance with knees together…

[Bear]

Great suggestion Urban,…I must have totally brain freezed on that when pulling my thoughts together on this.
The pose itself for the woman shouldn't be hard to initial draft… it is basically a forced doggy with the arms set in a different location.

[Bear]

well if it was linked to the avatars action that could be interesting a meter which displayed the pain level associated. Sadly though in the current mode of spanking it is a cycling pose,… irritating to me who might give a bottom a single firm smack and proceed to other play. If the action were a singular strike  it would have a stronger visual effect. Right now it feels mind numbing to engage and watch the constant barrage of the hand.

The other concern I have is that there is limited space again on the pose menu for MF. I suspect that any additions will have to be oriented towards wider appeal rather than a narrow scoped few.

[Bear]

Thanks prias! 

[Bear]

A lazy morning yesterday, and I reflected on a comment made to me by a partner while engaged in some heavy bdsm play. Being new to AChat she wondered why more bdsm poses weren't provided. Obviously it is because such bondage play like ours isn't for everyone. My thoughts though did drift to more vanilla forms of play, kinky aspects that even the mainstream might enjoy. The obvious choice to me was the use of a spreader bar.

[img]http://ep.yimg.com/ca/I/flirtylingerie_2166_1296733689[/img]

The hard part in this consideration was trying to figure some options for the woman. Restraint severely reduces her options, making her options more reactionary, then I flashed on the obvious solution to give her some variety in play, make it a static position to begin with. The giver standing behind the receiver, no action just motionless. For “poser” action is but a click away, for the descriptive crowd (and if you are bdsm oriented here, descriptive is mandatory) we are given that chance to weave our words without the troublesome distraction of already “fucking away”.
I user a generic form for this, a “giver” could be M/S/F (with strapon). Be interested if the females could see this useful without the strap-on…
spreader…my thoughts here really have not extended to a shemale/male bond such… I will leave that for comments of others to share:

Bdsm is not solely focused on rough physical play… for the majority it is about mixing the extremes of the sensations of pleasure and pain. Likewise the use of spanking as presented here, to allow the sensual play…

Standing intro.

GIVER:
1) spank (a single smack…NOT repeating… keep it to a single strike..this is not about continued striking.. ideally right hand, left hand options to corresponding butt cheek)
2) repeated spank… let it be an option not the default
3) Massage receivers ass
3) kneeling oral play…
4) finger vagina
5) finger ass
6)vaginal sex
7) anal sex
8. quick thrust
9) Hard thrust
10) Anal poke… a jabbing action
11)  (your thoughts here?… *grins*)

HER:
1)Ass rub.. to shift back and rub against the givers penis
2)wiggle bottom looking back teasing…
3)shake head no
4) partial entry press a slow shift back to take the givers penis cock partially.. then pulling off… it is a single action an anal option would also be interesting.. in this matter, the giver would be holding the penis 
5)rocking fuck
6)rolling hip fuck
7) enjoy (arching back)
8. enjoy (open mouth head shake)
9) not enjoy (eyes clench in grimace)
10)  hands clenching spreader.

The obvious as the image above is set… the position is easily adaptable to a 3some play…with another giver standing  at her head for oral pleasure.

The pose in general for a threesome would without restraints could be modified for 3some play, providing an option for those not into such intense action..

[Bear]

Well to recount a  point collars would make a fabulous add.  Be nice if some variations could be programmed there beside. Turquoise beads, puka shell variations for the guys would certainly be money makers over the plain jewelry we have. Battle bracelets for the guys…and glove options… besides my brown western variations, open fingered for the biker clans…(of which I would use in my Dom play..)

[Bear]

well I am not certain if you missed much sunny…I think I was the only one out there this weekend…though a couple of women did join in. Many thanks to them.

*rubbing my butt*) My backside was stinging of attention….(eying Lady_kalina.. )  that by the end of the day when slapped I responded “ouch”…and added comment to them my cheeks weren't red from a sunburn

[Author]

Posts