Navigation Menu

[Bear]

:

Fairness has to do with the economic model we discussed. Market analysis tends to show males dominated pay sites. In order to attract them, especially in a site like this there must be a large female population to entice membership growth. Even though there are considerably more women registered, the number of males online at any given time out number the women. Incentives must be maintained for the women to stick around. That's why the non-premium males don't get benefits the females do.

sinnnn you are correct they expand the 3some poses, I think not only will more people join but the existing premiums will be more eager to join.

[Bear]

Stated the one reason I want to talk with my partner and ignore cold invites,…impatience, untalkative partners are boring to begin with. Though Garryz brings the crucial point. If they can act it, feel it I see no harm in it if the can complete the fantasy for themselves and their partners.

[Bear]

No doubt, Janine,..there is no beta site,…and this strikes me as the first major change I have seen introduced and retracted. However I think they understand that it was received with raves for the most part and we will see it return with refinements.. Nice that you could just switch it off it you didn't like it.

[Bear]

*shrugs,…sucking fingers,…not certain why it's included,…guess you could take it as a personal emote if you're not enjoying yourself…

[Bear]

That is why I consider it their problem. I pay, they don't. They shouldn't get the run of the chicken coop for the hell of it while my rates paying for the eggs go up.

[Bear]

An influx of new bodies here posting their desires certainly helps. I feel confident if a wave of new posters calling for the general chat return would be acknowledged. Just the same it's nice and refreshing to see some new faces in here posting.

[Bear]

Beat me to it Adrea,…have had some tremendous hot sex at that time…

[Bear]

It was discussed at length under the “economic theory and A$” thread. Best I can say is dangle the carrot and tell him to join up with a promise of things to come. There is no other site that I know of that gives such freebies as this to  to non-subscribers.

Premiums pay the way,…and as the development and increased load continues we pay more for the non-premiums use. That's the lose-lose.

The cost isn't that much.

[Bear]

Janine's pool party,…
What ever happened to that thread?

[Bear]

That would be corrected if more poses were available for the 3somes,…the interest would change. An enticement like that would drive up memberships.

[Bear]

“oil is low” works quite nicely,..(often true) if continued to be pressed.

[Bear]

I am of the opinion it was an experiment that was cut way too short. Tom you should have let it ride longer, see if the channels would have settled out with better usage. General chat was a fantastic idea, the only improvement might have been as noted to offer regional or language specific channels,

I would definitely rename “Naughty bitches” though,..too many would think of it as insulting.

Would be nice to see the user created chat room as Janine suggested,…and I have mentioned before, perhaps as an avatar room,…a hot tub let's say for general chat.

[Bear]

I can empathize with the situation, being that some guys do not understand the string of inquiries and cold invites that the women receive. I have received the same, pressure form women wanting an explanation, dumbfounded when I say not interested.

[Bear]

I'll reiterate a position I have stated. Some things need to be premium only.

[Bear]

I agree with Garryz, if it was technical then fine. But it seemed hardly enough time to make a community assessment.What I saw was an evolution of the interaction,…perhaps abused by some morons,.but hopefully their manners were enough for others to assess there worthiness as potential partners.

There were other channels available if people wanted to hold spamless chatting,…something the community failed to utilize.

[Author]

Posts