Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
HI,
the level 10 rule is absolutely wrong and incorrect.
if a user who has not yet reached level 10, buys A$, buys valid and not free A$!
the level 10 rule must be eliminated because it is discriminatory and unfair.The best solution is:
the user who will have those damned A$ welcome gifts (1000 A$£) will be able to purchase only and exclusively poses and clothes owned by ACHAT, including poses and clothes that ACHAT pays to the designers in A$ and which obviously become the property of the game. (it still remains to be understood whether the money that Achat then pays is to be considered valid or not for the purposes of actual purchases).Clothes and poses published by creators in the Developer Console, who therefore only earn if they sell, can only be purchased with A$ purchased or received as a gift. (gifts can only be given with A$ purchased)
I’ll give a simple example that maybe someone from support will read this post and understand.
the user who has 1500A$ (500A$ from welcome gift and 1000 purchased or given as a gift) and wants to buy my most expensive set of underwear which costs 1269 cannot and should not buy it because the difference of 269 comes from the welcome gift .It doesn’t seem like such a difficult solution to implement.
there would be advantages both for us creators and for Achat who would not have to carry out these checks.It is obvious, but not obvious, that if the new rule wants to be implemented (and I am the first to accept and share it) it will have to be implemented after eliminating the credits earned with the old system. (I personally deducted about $1300 from +700 to -669).
Errors made due to mismanagement or simply incorrect evaluation cannot be the responsibility of the creators who, like me and I think for everyone, commit time and passion.in the Achat announcement we talk about consolidated users, but the most consolidated are the creators themselves.
Personally, being currently the oldest creator, in over 2 years my creations have brought over $10,000 (equivalent to A$2,000,000) into Achat’s coffers.
I would add: we have been told that purchases made with the welcome gift AS are already checked.
This 10th level rule is absolutely made up and baselessI completely agree
I understand the reasons behind the game but the way it was implemented is wrong for several reasons.
1. Things have been like this for years and you only realize it now.
2. the decision cannot be retroactive as the designers are not responsible for your mishandling.the best way to avoid this is not to allow new users to purchase the designers’ “private” items if they do not have the entire sum deriving from the purchases or gifts received. (I remind you that the 1000 welcome cannot be given as a gift).
they preferred to cut with the new rule (certainly done badly for some numbers seen)Then there is another question that should be clarified. many designers prefer to sell their creations directly to the medium in exchange for A$. How are these credits considered?
Achat, instead of spending time ripping off the creators, might think about updating the game since many competing platforms are much more advanced than this one and this one hasn’t seen any major updates in years.
Achat, as Vaughan rightly points out, survives only our creations.
Achat should better organize its way of managing the game because it is not possible to wait more than 10 months for the publication of an outfit always after a reminder from the creator, as long as this outfit is not lost among the emails that are not read.
Achat, if he cares about the game, must be more attentive to user suggestions.
Achat doesn’t understand that this game is destined to die.
Personally I’ve been having several changes with assistance lately. This latest event is clear demonstration that Achat is only interested in making money with minimal effort.as I have already written regarding purchases with the welcome A$1000, it is true that there is no real profit, but the A$ purchased or obtained in the form of a gift is.
I am sending you my email exchange with support which shows that they don’t even know what they are doing and that they make fun of us considering us idiots:
myself:
I don’t understand this update.
Isn’t the money of a user below level 10 worth it?
if a user lower than 10 then moves up to a higher level, are his purchases subsequently considered good?
you made this rule retroactive and it is not acceptable.
from my balance I am negative by $669 while yesterday I was positive by $731
is it a joke?support:
Hi,we are terribly sorry, the correction of the balance was made because the purchases of the registered free users were also counted, which means no real income. This way we have paid more for the designs than it comes to form the real (countable) sales, and the balance can turn even to negative. We can make new payouts when the balance is positive again.
Sorry, we had to correct the data, as we have made payouts without real income base. These payouts were already done, so our correction is not retroactive regarding this part.
myself:
no! I’m sorry.
you had already done the counting of free registered users in the past.
I wrote to you to understand why the number of pieces sold sometimes dropped and you gave me this explanation.in the notice you say that users who have not reached level 10 are not counted and therefore eliminated.
you have removed me from the count of clothes that the registered free user cannot buy because it goes beyond the A$1000 that is given as a welcome gift from you.it is clear that they write one thing on the site and respond to another by email.
I leave the considerations to youYou’re not the only one with a negative balance.
I wrote and asked for explanations also why new retroactive rules cannot be made.
I really think I will abandon the game if their line is this.
instead of improving the game….I find it outrageous to have to pay for a version that is and will remain only a beta for a long time.
the graphics compared to other games that use the same graphics engine are ugly and feel plasticky.
I remain of the idea that the classic Achat should be improved and updated rather than creating a new one.
Unfortunately the developers don’t want to listen to the suggestions we gave them.@Vaughan
believe me …. I have so many models started and never finished.
unfortunately the waiting times to see their models published have reached about 7 months and this depresses and makes the desire pass.
unfortunately lately I see many users who believe they are designers and propose badly made clothes and in an approximate way.
I also don’t think I’m perfect but I try to improve myself every time. But the biggest fault lies with the media approving each type of dress that is proposed.
Paradoxically, I was challenged using a color that was too dark for them but instead had been sought and studied by me.
I don’t mention names but some users are really unable to draw.
I hope you understand my choice to never make a dress that has the long and short variant.
At the moment I am only proposing ideas for men’s Polo shirts but 90% I will send themyou must not!
hi boys,
thanks for the appreciation on my first try.
I appreciate the suggestions you give me more.
for me it is important to know what you like so that I have a guideline to follow.
I ask you if you can always send me a picture of what you have in mind.answering your questions:
@Vaughan: I can do both horizontal and vertical lines. I have to try to do them and then I will send you the draft on the forum.
@ Vaughan: I can make shorter shirts but I don’t know the effect in the editor yet. Personally, I don’t really like short shirts for boys but it’s my taste. I’ll try that too@WilliamHill: Thanks William. the one I posted on the first try. I’ve already changed the colors because I don’t like them very much.
if you have something in mind post me a photo.huny is reaching stratospheric levels.
her style is unmistakable and her taste in using lace is delightful.
I have a great friend and colleague with whom talking and exchanging advice is invaluable. -
AuthorPosts