Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Just a qwick question regarding ignore list on the forum, am I right in thinking that when I add a person to my ignore list this only means they cannot send me personal messages but can still put their pennies worth in when I start a thread?
The thing is I'm thinking the majority of people wouldnt really be interested in feed back from people on their ignore list on topics they raise
Well I am happy to see the cuffs finally come out, even if the attempt is a little on the lame side. I want some slapping but not on the butt with a open hand…. I want across the face with somethingelse
ooooh Janine lmao… Yes I can imagine the look on your face if a unidentified object came through that glory hole unexpectedly and attempted to intrude on the action… omg lol
I would like to see a room with a peep hole so a third party can watch…. Yeah I know a real kinky guy that would love that. Maybe even a hole at waste level so a certain part of his anatomy could enter the room š® …… Oh I have said too much , let me stop before I appear to be perverted to the max :-X
January 22, 2011 at 3:14 am in reply to: MF Pose Review ā Free Item. 181. From Behind (standing doggy) #9210Mmm,..taken from behind pressed against those glass windows?
Knowing achat the woman will probably go through the window… or her hands at least will! Hence the moment is ruined
January 22, 2011 at 1:38 am in reply to: MF Pose Review ā Free Item. 181. From Behind (standing doggy) #9208Ohh gosh I really had to laugh out truly loud at Lovers comment about the female wishing the table in the air, its so true though has thats exactly how it looks. I would love to see a new position where the woman can be taken from behind but up against the wall, mmmm orĀ actually over the balcony of the penthouse would be even betterĀ :o. For the cost of the penthouse a few little extras really should of been thrown in, instead of contemporary decoration alone
January 21, 2011 at 12:56 am in reply to: Owning. Getting REAL PISSED with the “owning” thing. #46227Bear you keep calling me Carmel, its Caramel but its cool, you see I am a women of peace so I don't take it personal bb rwl
Relax before you do yourself a injury, I'm glad you found somebody to talk to maybe now you will pack up your violin, have fun hun
Christina Lets do honesty then and I shall try hard to remember I am a lady when doing it, So in that case I won't say how your line of questioning towards me began. Christina you are qwick to blame all this on the jerk off but in fact we only have your word on the accusation that it was all his idear. Lets remember his version of events is very different then yours. You were very qwick to tell me that he claimed me and him engage in activities offline, but he denies saying this to you and I know that its totally untrue, but you automatically expected me to believe you over him
Like I originally said,Ā I never asked you to contact me and your account of the discussions we had are now very much distorted from what was actually said. Ermmm yeah I was “so rude” to you that you came back private messaging again with pleasentriesĀ two days after the initial exchange of words!
Christina it's not that I don't want to be contacted by anyone…. What I want is not to be contacted with foolishness…So I'm at ease now with the fact you find me rude and think I have an attitude has this means if theres a next time you allege a guy uses you to try and sway women into having relations with him you will steer clear of the likes of me.
If you have apologised to all the people involved then that should of been sufficent to put your conscience at rest so really no need to bring it to the forum (yet I am over the topĀ ). It's a shame the guy in question dosen't seem to post on here, because if he did then possibly all could see the whole picture has he tells a different tale from you. Christina for me it was over the night you approached me, it is you that keeps bringing it back up…
Enough thanxs, enjoy your game… Oh and Bobbler what do you know this? I'm guessing because you were totally alone in your opinons on the owning topic you have jumped on the band wagon of this one … looking for some back up lmao
What i will keep in mind in this- When you approached me I made it clear that I am hetero, and you replied by saying you are not approaching me for sex! When in fact thats exactly what you was approaching me for… I don't ask for you to keep saying sorry, all I ask is you be totally honest if you choose to ask for honest feedback.
I also ask you that in future you think before you act of behalf of some jerk off, the mere fact that he does not appear on my friends or lovers list is a clear indication that he is neither to me. For me this is the end of discussion , all I asked of you is to be honest, and remember I never asked to get involved in none of this! Things like this are the reason my avatar is harse, I want to avoid approches from females and Jerks off's
Lover that advice was spot on! Right now down to basic's!
I have nothing to hide so I speak out now and say I was nearly one of the victims of this “drama” but I would like to make it clear that i did not participate in any ffm so i presume this was another female victim.
Christina to be frank my dear I am a little angry now has some of this storey is missing and this has led to me feeling the need to speak out. You and I know what my first question to you was when you approched me, after allegedly being sent by the JERK OFF! and you know what your answer was- this is my problem with the situation.Ā Christina IĀ have no problem with you sharing the whole storey including all what you told me the JERK OFF claimed me and him have done, the problem i have right now is the whole storey is not being told and this is not on. If its true that you were naive enough to act has this guys lacky, then this is unfortunate and can only be taken has a lesson learnt. You have choosen to discuss this in the forum i pressume because you feel like you have been the victim of the jerk off but are you the real victim here?
January 20, 2011 at 5:41 pm in reply to: Owning. Getting REAL PISSED with the “owning” thing. #46219Janine I totally agree with what you have said, the thing is like I said in my original post on this topic… We all need to be a little tolerant to other players and what floats their boat. I mean wouldn't this place be boring if the members were all here for the same thing? We may has well all just spend $99 dollars on the misonary position…. lay back…..andĀ play some Barry White … Maybe then we would be considered has big old romantics or normal…
January 20, 2011 at 2:41 am in reply to: Owning. Getting REAL PISSED with the “owning” thing. #46214I am unsure if being on Ramrods lovers list means I fall into the catogory of one of his “dommed girls” but it seems you claim toĀ know more then me about his alleged spending habits /reasons behind it and rooming gamesĀ
And please forgive me for the previous typo :… I think it was because Ramrods name was mentioned and I got all excited *blushing again* …….. For my blood pressure and the benefit of others I think It's time to move on from him and back to the topic in general
January 20, 2011 at 12:56 am in reply to: Owning. Getting REAL PISSED with the “owning” thing. #46212: I personally wouldn't know if Ramrod buys outfits for “his doomed girls” I don't know how anybodyelse but him and the girl/girls would know? It's hard to comment on something when it's not proven. Another point would be, if Ramrod indeed does buy females clothing then he would be one of many men that do … so the question would be why focus on Ramrod?
Basically to rephrase the question- would be asking if any guy gifts a girl isnt this a form of owning? My answer would be no to that
January 19, 2011 at 2:48 am in reply to: Owning. Getting REAL PISSED with the “owning” thing. #46206Hence I never named the “party” , I think what we also need to bare in mind is there are many that have been named and insulted many a times on forums and don't even know its happening has they don't enter the forum. Maybe this is something for achat to address? Maybe when reffering to a absent individual their name should not be allowed?
-
AuthorPosts