Navigation Menu

[Elle_C]

Currently, public sex in Summer or the streets (too snowy in winter!  brrrr!) is the perfect voyeur room. You can watch or be watched, and perhaps take over if somebody leaves!

Of course, you never know if a friend is going to walk in on you, and be absolutely shocked by your wild behavior…

Unfortunately, in the current implementation, public sex has a lot of limitations, including:

• no orgasms
  no speed controls
  furniture that materializes or dematerializes
  inability to use outdoor objects as props
  coding problems that can cause massive client slow-down, even on the fastest of machines and graphics cards

[/list]

Therefore, allowing residents of a room to turn on or off a voyeur control, would be nice. I would suggest that once voyeur is on, the participants get an invite interface that allows them to invite either…
(1) someone, by name,  into the room. That person is visually present and can chat with those in the room. … or…
(2) anyone. Those people can only see the action and read the chat, they are not visibly present.

[Elle_C]

I have this favorite miniskirt that, without panties, has such a high hemline it shows everything. If people still patronized the red light district, I'd be tempted to put myself on sale there, miniskirt without panties or top, and let whomever purchased me have their way with me. I've never sold my body, so it would be a new thrill.

Unfortunately, the night area is empty now, so the chances of any fun seem very slim.

[Elle_C]

I've encountered scummy sorts. I'm sure an upset harasser can make your life miserable if they're dedicated enough. But, like trolls, if you ignore them, most gradually get tired, bored and discouraged. What they want is your attention. A pay wall (premium membership) won't slow them down for long.

I'm sure you can think of many negatives to a premium-only area. Two big ones that would keep me away are:
(a) cannot enjoy time with my non-premium friends there; and
(b) cannot meet true newcomers on trial accounts; and
(c) cannot “experiment” with my friends using an alternate personas at a low cost.

[Elle_C]

As a relative newcomer, but one-year premium member, I find the like/dislike system useless.

As a bisexual female, I find that that voting works two ways:
(a) whenever I politely decline to be a guy's fuck-toy, I'm a bitch and get a dislike.
(b) whenever I chat with a woman and treat her like a real person, I get a like.

So, with women, having a good number of both is a badge of honor, of sorts. Needless to say, this is contrary to what the novice would expect.

I imagine that for men, like/dislike works in a more expected way. Nice fellows are generally liked by women, while assholes are generally disliked by women, and most men probably don't rate each other at all (except for mutual likes to appear more attractive). But I don't really know, since I've only had one multi-sentence conversation with a man that didn't involve sex.

Once I realized that “level” referred to how many sex places and positions you'd bought, I found it a generally useful value, but that's not the usual understanding of the word “level” in the online world.

IMPORTANT – NEED SEXUAL ORIENTATION

I cannot see sexual orientation of anyone until I ask, or we become friends.  My usual  “gaydar” with looks and body language doesn't work in Achat.

On the other hand, the (s) tag for shemales is very helpful. Saves a lot of embarasment later – on when you realize none of your FF or FFF sex positions will work.

[Author]

Posts