Skip to content

Janine Dee

- Not logged in to forum -

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,251 through 2,265 (of 2,459 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ramrod29. Greetings. #17078
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    Hello Ramrod… sorry was away for a good day or so. Welcome to the forum.

    Janine Dee
    Participant

    I have to disagree on the smaller icons… they're pretty tiny as it is. Still, we express our opinions, the development team reads them, and decides what's a good idea of not.  ;)

    I do like Carli's addition of wanting them to flash when the other person selects.

    The collapsible tabs COULD have the potential of slowing the action a bit, but it would really open up the room for AChat to grow.

    A different version could be tabbed by type, which would retain the flashing idea.

    Like for FF they could have a Toy tab, and a Non-Toy Tab.

    Of course for that to be necessary they would have to fill the FF positions up.  :P

    Janine Dee
    Participant

    I've yet to want to sell back a position, but I have had that happen with some of the wardrobe choices.

    Thinking about it just now however I realized why they might not allow it.

    What would stop people from buying something, using it, and then returning it when done? They want to use it again, they buy it again, etc, etc, etc.

    At the very least a return system would require a secondary list of stuff you already bought once  so that you couldn't “rent” it like that.

    I liked the idea of every wardrobe choice being available while offline so you could see how they looked, but you needed to buy them to use them on AChat.

    Having all the positions with the Robot Boy and Girl could run into a similar problem with the people who just want to get off doing so on the cheap with ALL the positions available.

    As it is I would say I haven't even regretted 1/10th of the stuff I've bought so I can't call the problem big enough to require a fix, but that's my A$ .02.

    in reply to: Janine’s Pool Party #17054
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    That's why there's the word “full” in front of it… get rid of all that obstructive clothing.

    in reply to: Janine’s Pool Party #17052
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    You do have to report to me though… a full debriefing… which is this case actually means getting naked and getting in the tub.  :-*

    in reply to: Clothing Ideas and clothing pic wish list #10934
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    And here you didn't even ask if I was going to kiss that arrow-pierced heart or those wet panties?

    in reply to: Janine’s Pool Party #17049
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    I was hoping that was the case… so we can all forget what I said earlier… were back on the Crowley rule set here people! *various cheers*

    And welcome to the party Bear.

    in reply to: More Lesbian Poses. FF and FFF. #14010
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    And on the threesomes… I haven't kept track of any numbers but I would estimate it's at least 10 to 1, one on one versus threesome.

    It can be difficult enough to find one partner you want to room with, two can seem almost impossible at times.

    While new threesome positions may help that I imagine it will always be a struggle to find that third.

    That could be part of the development teams reasoning… the one on one's will get more use.

    Janine Dee
    Participant

    I can't call it discrimination… it's called running a business.

    I mean when I started speaking up for F/F I didn't just call for “more” I gave examples, and some I got, some I was pleasantly surprised by.

    The gay/bi guys haven't called for more, and haven't given examples. So what would you have the development team do exactly?

    Work on the expressed requests of their paying customers or toil on positions that might not wanted by those who haven't said they've wanted them?

    That said the guys here HAVE been asking for more clothes and everyone has said guys should be able to get gifts. So I kinda see those as separate.

    Janine Dee
    Participant

    While FF is no where near full yet I have to say I REALLY like Sinnnn's idea… the collapsible menus could REALLY open up the window.

    in reply to: Janine’s Pool Party #17045
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    Hummm I had wondered if it had been removed or if Sinnnn had removed it since you two were the only ones who had posted… still at least for now maybe we should try to keep it PG-13.

    in reply to: Suggestions for a better AChat experience #9781
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    Actually I do, it's one of the reasons I get as angry as I do. I talk about how I get into it, how I type the stuff the positions don't cover and then when we get in room and I'm typing the foreplay I see the 69 flashing.

    So yeah, I do say, and it's seems more a matter of getting me in the room, and doing whatever it takes to do so.

    in reply to: Suggestions for a better AChat experience #9778
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    So they want to use me as a masturbation aid and I'm wrong for not being okay with that? I will always say to each their own, but if their goal is to satisfy themselves while disappointing me we're both better off getting out of the room and finding playmates more our own temperament.

    in reply to: Clothing Ideas and clothing pic wish list #10932
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    No… but I could kiss it and make it better.

    in reply to: Janine’s Pool Party #17043
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    *Hearing the bus unloading I hop out of the tub to grab a second water while disposing of the first bottle and then I hit the stereo and set it to “random”. As the people start entering I return some greetings, no one seeming surprised at my nudity, seeming to know it was that kind of party. Hopping back into the tub several of the women are already joining me, some still in their suits, some just in the bottoms, some stripping down entirely.*

Viewing 15 posts - 2,251 through 2,265 (of 2,459 total)