Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Yeah, that's what the comment thread is for. I was more saying that you can vote 1-5 to give your vote more texture, and then flesh out your opinion in the comments.
I have to say I'm liking the 5 star system. More then once when doing the FF reviews I put in more then two options because a simple yes or no didn't feel sufficient. When you consider that the comment thread is going to be there (and inevitably used) either way then a 5 star system would give people more options in expressing their views on a pose while also making the successes that much more apparent to the development team. (Which should help them know what types are popular or not.)
Because until they log in they effectively cease to exist.
April 17, 2012 at 11:46 am in reply to: MS. Pose Review Request. 104. Hot Legs and Feet. Man kneeling. #62968Actually I've always approached it like each move for each grouping as a whole different entity. Though in my case it was primarily because I was getting sick of the strap-on penis substitute being 90% of the conversion.
(Though again Rukya's point about how that's not so bad if they crank out the conversions faster still stands.)
On the Trek uniform issue… parody IS protected speech. It's why there are now a flood of parody pron movies out. So replacing the Starfleet insignia SHOULD be enough to satisfy the legal hurdle.
Welcome to the Forum Kevlar, you're in the right place.
Happy Easter everyone.
I approve here.
April 5, 2012 at 11:32 am in reply to: (Vote) Abolition of the option "Ignore all free users" #61636Meh, all they have to do is actually talk to premiums (which would make a modification of the Zzzz likely) which is at the heart of the point for at least most of those in favor of the Zzzz anyway,
April 5, 2012 at 11:08 am in reply to: (Vote) Abolition of the option "Ignore all free users" #61634Okay, back from vacation (full blown out of town vacation, not from the Forum, but from the PC and home entirely).
Jeanona… I didn't direct it at you specifically, because I didn't see it as such, though I realize my wording looked otherwise. I should have phrased it perhaps “The core idea seems to be…” Because in discussions I have found it can help to make sure people are on the same page, even when on different sides of an issue, and I wanted to say that the core idea seemed to be whether or not an option should be removed from the game.
The reason I do such on occasion is because tangents happen.
Like me saying I really like New's idea for allowing free users to only invite free users, but be invited by premiums… I think that could have as much if not more effect on the annoying hails as the current Zzzz button.
Hummm when this discussion first came up the seeming consensus was that you could play that you were younger, but had to make the statement that you were of age. Like people can play airline pilots or police officers with out actually being members of that profession.
Still, that would seem to say they put a solid ban down on all ageplay. It's probably for the best.
March 29, 2012 at 1:30 pm in reply to: Easiest Approach to Maximize your success with some of the ladies #62049And read the profile. A guy telling a gay girl he wants to fuck her is going to have about as much success on AChat as in real life.
I know there are some girls who use homo to try to filter guys, but assuming that's the case will just have all us sincerely gay girls wanting to filter/ignore or whatever.
March 29, 2012 at 3:08 am in reply to: (Vote) Abolition of the option "Ignore all free users" #61605I have to agree Zinah. While I want to keep the Free Ignore option if they implemented a way to shut down invites until I turn it on I would use that option much, much more.
Okay with the “teen” word coming into play I need to say that if you want to PLAY under 18 is one thing, consenting adult age play is perfectly acceptable, but people honestly under 18 are not allowed here on this forum or AChat, and for obvious legal reasons that has to be basically that.
March 28, 2012 at 10:49 pm in reply to: (Vote) Abolition of the option "Ignore all free users" #61598Umm Adrea dear as a semi-professional Devil's Advocate I would suggest not taking such an extreme example.
Perhaps to say… what if to make free users feel more welcome they take away the ability to refuse invites? You can still leave the room, but if they feel they want to get to know you better they can pull you into a room so they can make their request in a more personal way.
I will however say that this thread seems designed with the idea of “I don't like people having this choice available so I want to take it away from them.”
-
AuthorPosts