Navigation Menu

[Janine Dee]

I get that Bear, I do. I just can't feel the texture unless I've been there, and for me all the positions and suggestions I need the texture.

Still, I'm better at suggesting new positions then revamping the old.

[Janine Dee]

That is the issue really. All that I can think of however is to keep the messages/screencaps, and if he follows through give them to any and all who ask.

[Janine Dee]

Hi Sandra and welcome.

I don't have this problem with lobby sex really because if it gets going I ask to room, even if we just type back and forth, BUT I have accidentally had some people think I was trying to get THEM to room when I was meaning to send it to one woman or another but had their name in the box for one reason or another. (Typically because I like to look up the profile of any and all hails/colds. If for no other reason then to mentally mock the guys trying to cold invite me.)

[Janine Dee]

Heck relationships by their very nature get confusing. 

That said that said my view on spouses can be seen by looking AT my spouse. 

My view could be summarized as this game will be what you make of it. I've had lovers where I've ended things when they got too clingy, and I've made friends that I've been able to share thoughts I can't share with those near and dear to me in real life.

[Janine Dee]

Bear I rarely say what I would see changed to make any pose FF. I've always felt I can't since I haven't really “seen” it. I'll talk about those that I feel have the potential, but I stay away from the detail work because I don't “know”.

I do agree on the balance of actions as well as grabbing the throat would be nice.

[Janine Dee]

The women's styles of the 20's always struck me as a little too formless. I'd rather wear that pinstripe suit then the dress.

[Janine Dee]

Agreed, FF would be cool, but as always I make sure I keep my expectations realistic while keeping things like the hope generated by the implementation of the  double ender.

[Janine Dee]

Not arguing that so much as saying that at least here they can have people stating whether or not they want a certain type of pose. Making this usable by men would be done without even that. They would be gambling that enough guys would buy it to make it worthwhile in the face of the guys are at least SAYING they don't like receiving anally.

[Janine Dee]

I think… and this is only my thoughts, but in a strange way I want to connect it to the toys being used an penile substitutes in the FF poses… an idea they have that they can't seem to let go of.

In the same way they may still be stuck on the idea that sexy MUST equal showing skin.

In both cases it's an idea that relies on over sexing an image rather then trying to understand some of the notions that underlay it.

My question though is in the rolls are there ANY guys who are buying these outfits? Obviously not on here, but could this be a cases of the guys on the actual AChat servers buying them? 

[Janine Dee]

The trouble with the male receiving anal poses is that there is a sort of preconception that it's somehow wrong or bad for the guy to want it. Still it could be made MF or even MM, but since it's hard to know what the true call for it would be before it was released the Development Team would be left having to gamble on it.

[Janine Dee]

I agree Mistress_N, but I also figure that clothing is also far easier to produce then positions. So for little cost on their end they can net a nice profit… hence all the dresses coming out.

[Janine Dee]

NOT just guys! 

[Janine Dee]

Okay, actually found something I can add in on.  Mistakes happen, grips on sweaty flesh become less reliable… safety is always good.  So if the stools are expecting a great deal of motion bolting them down would be wise.

[Janine Dee]

As you may have already guessed the persons name has come up before and it was in a long discussion on servitude in the game and they were mentioned as someone who did NOT get it. It is refreshing to see another who does. 

[Janine Dee]

The trick one must always remember here is that it IS a for profit enterprise.

It’s why while I’ll always call for more FF and FFF positions I do NOT expect them to ever equal MF. I don’t take it personally, it really is just business.

The idea applies all across the spectrum as well to shemales as well. If they are just buying the FS and SS that’s going to effect the numbers, but the important thing to remember is that it’s highly likely that the Development Team is looking at the total numbers. So they don’t care WHO buys the MS as long as someone does. So if those numbers are down, they are down across the board.

It is a part of why I always buy all the FF and FFF… I know at the very least I am putting my money where my mouth is. (Feel free to make the requisite naughty jokes.)

I am however VERY encouraged by the recent developments. FF is getting positions where toys are just toys and not penile substitutes, and the BDSM poses are delving past the spanking most any couple may try at some point or another.

And yes riding crops/standing spanking would be lovely. ;D

[Author]

Posts