Skip to content

Janine Dee

- Not logged in to forum -

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 2,459 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Collecting ideas for this forum #60871
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    I think the idea Rukya is that it has grown. Looking at Az's requirements people are “wearing” mandated tags in game. So it seems to have become more like those groups you see people tagging their profiles with to indicate membership… just the first spawned by the forum.

    Almost like a guild in a MMORPG.

    in reply to: Editing cloth textures #16155
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    I personally agree with the percentage based model just because it rewards those who do better work then allowing just about anyone to slap together texture maps and then sell them at the same price as those who actually put in time and effort perfecting their designs.

    in reply to: iPad and Tablet version of Achat. #48975
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    To the pro camp (developers please take note) most every social media out there is now available in ap forms, but to my knowledge none of the adult formats are… this is literally a vastly untapped market. I'm not sure what the hurdles would be , but I think the potential at least warrants a good hard look at those hurdles to see if they could be cleared.

    in reply to: iPad and Tablet version of Achat. #48970
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    Hello Love, welcome back.  :-*

    This was brought up before for smartphones, and my concern was getting an adult use ap for mobile devices… I had concerns, but I forgot the ultimate rule of “sex sells” and it's moving onto the portable format of tablets and phones.

    So I now think the possibility exists, but now the question is processing power. *I* think it would work since I saw the iTunes store offering GTA3 for the iPad (and I still have the damn game on disc for my PS2) , but I'm not sure how well the conversion would work.

    Any of our more tech-savy souls have a better perspective?

    in reply to: FF Pose Review Request. 26. Anal Doggy. #23900
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    The adaptation WAS quick. That's a very good point. If they can switch it over that speedily I could put up with some silly wanking options.

    in reply to: Room Ideas. #14917
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    Actually zero g would probably suck to program, but would be REALLY hot if they did.

    in reply to: NEW POSES FOR LBGT COMMUNITY SO FAIR PLAY FOR ALL. #56330
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    We’re giddy about the FF. So your erection is even less of a concern then normal.

    😛 😉 ;D

    in reply to: NEW POSES FOR LBGT COMMUNITY SO FAIR PLAY FOR ALL. #56328
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    I know, I know, I know, I know!!! And after writing up the review I realized they gave me my fingering suggestion all in one! I am SO delighted with this pose!

    DEFINITELY a credit where it is due moment. ;D

    in reply to: More Lesbian Poses. FF and FFF. #55508
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    We got a conversion we asked for. So adding an extra thank you to the development team.

    One down, three to go.  ;D

    in reply to: Group Pose ideas – 3 people & plus. MMF. MFS. MFF. #44554
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    I'm actually really glad you did this. I've kinda had a mental back burner for reviewing the FFF poses. Now maybe I can start finding volunteers and get some files put together.

    in reply to: More Lesbian Poses. FF and FFF. #55458
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    I don't think they can be told that too often Rukya, because there are still FF strap on poses coming out with the hand job/jerk off. So it's one of those funny because it's true kind of things.

    in reply to: ANOUNCEMENT #59032
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    My view, free flight, simply because interest will come and go, and the development team has seemed more responsive to entirely new suggestions then suggestions for updating… or at least in my view.

    in reply to: Clothing Brands and Logos. Fashion Houses. #53624
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    Percentages are a definite option, but it would regulate itself like any other market. If you have more selling then buying sellers will start to fail. Now if they sell their own, and use the funds to buy from each other then they are both seller and buyer, but either way unless new A$ would flow into the system it would collapse naturally.

    By the same token it might get some A$ flowing that hasn't been. I know I'm sitting on several thousand I am primarily keeping for poses, but if I were to say be able to commission Keiko to make me some fetish gear I'd be willing to part with some of it. By the same token if she wanted half my account for say 1-2 outfits I would turn her down.

    So percentages are an option, or the development team could charge for things like shop space where you pay for a place to sell your wares in their shop. In that way they could keep additional A$ flowing, while providing a control to the marketplace since people couldn't just slap together designs and put them up and see if anyone will buy them, but would have to put up their own funds to run a shop, and hopefully turn a profit.

    So designers can make A$, the development team can make more real $ though the flow of A$ as well as be able to focus more on developing poses or the interface, and the users would be able to get clothes they are actually interested in.

    To me it seems win, win, win, and the only loose would be those who loose in the marketplace because they can't provide product people want to buy.

    Janine Dee
    Participant

    Don't worry about it Ana… my view is just one view. Some will agree, and some will not. A good part of the point of these threads is to discuss details of larger concepts. I see the “Partner's View” as one of those details, and ultimately it's up to the Development Team. All you and I do is suggest.

    Still, support of a PIP seems good.  :)

    in reply to: Clothing Brands and Logos. Fashion Houses. #53616
    Janine Dee
    Participant

    Ummm Hentai, more premiums are good. More money to the AChat team means more resources available to develop AChat. Money might not make the world go round, but it certainly greases the gears.

    As far as my personal thoughts on individual styles… much like real brands it would be a matter of the cost of wearing the style, and if you would consider it worth it.

    I mean while I certainly like to dress well I'm not one of those you see with every article of clothing carrying one brand label or another visible.

    But I also don't have the thousands sitting in my bank account like I do in AChat.

    I also really like the idea of certain articles being available for certain events.

    It's looking like the market is there if the Development Team would want it, and I'm thinking most anything that keeps the A$ flowing would be welcomed.

    As far as favors… Keiko need only ask  :-* and Tight's out of luck.  ;D Honestly though I tihnk that if you go through the work of making the design you should be able to distribute it as you see fit. I would like to see the AChat Marketplace be self-regulating. If something is good, it sells, if it's not, or if the price is just unreasonable it doesn't.

    Anything else and mediocrity gets subsidized while talent gets punished.

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 2,459 total)