Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
I see this only becoming possible if/once the tool set is implemented… which is going to have me start a new thread on a slightly related topic that I think will be strong enough for it's own heading.
March 5, 2012 at 11:21 pm in reply to: PIP – picture in picture option with camera position lock #60952Agreed on the on and off. Not sure how I feel on partner's view. The coding would probably become more complex, but maybe not since we don't know how it works camera's right now. For my usage though while I might use PIP to say observe more then one angle (say go first person when I'm eating pussy and Cam 1 on her body) I think seeing her angles would take me out of the moment.
And here on the Forum we allow stuff time to load, on AChat it would have to be real time. You have the knowledge, so would it NOT slow the AChat program down to have to store it on their end?
Just had a thought as to why it might not be universal… having it stored on their systems would probably mean additional requests to and from their servers for your Ignore list to compare. On your system though the active Ignoring could be handled entirely by your system. I mean it's not a heavy duty bit of processing, but if it was multiplied by every user on line and then piled on their servers?
March 5, 2012 at 5:07 am in reply to: PIP – picture in picture option with camera position lock #60942I like the idea, and if the PIP was handled basically like a added camera feed where you could switch your cam controls from main cam to PIP and back again the coding shouldn't be TOO difficult.
March 3, 2012 at 3:23 pm in reply to: [VOTE] For your Favorite Threesome Pose Idea – [CLOSED] #57173As a note Fate the developers need more then pictures. The largest group of examples I know of can be found when I set up the voting threads in Women with Women but I would suggest maybe more like.
(Picture)
Name of Pose
Partner 1
Action 1
Action 2
Action 3 (etc)Partner 2
Action 1
Action 2
Action 3 (etc)Partner 3
Action 1
Action 2
Action 3 (etc)It seems to increase the odds of the idea seeing development.
Like you say “Thank you for letting me share.” I have to say “Thank you for sharing.”
First idea, could we make the most recent pose a sticky? Then just switch it as new poses get implemented?
And we honestly didn't WANT to hurt anyone, but people were already being hurt. I can't help but compare this topic to an poorly set bone, or an infected wound. The bone has to be re-broken, or the wound has to be lanced and the infection drained for there to be actual healing.
Because we may be hated, but action IS finally coming about.
Page 3, Bear's post, he had said he had left, and came back for this thread.
In my very first post on the subject I said I have been getting ready to leave.
Tight stated it plainly in his most recent.
Pafe in her first post on the subject said the OT nearly kept her from bothering with the Forum.
Now while we've had pages and pages on our “tone” the fact that with Zinah added in you have 2 gone, 2 ready to go, and one (a newbie) nearly driven off before she ever started posting, and in all those pages about all the horrible things our “tone” communicated those people were ignored. Which to me sets the “tone” that they are not as important as the right to post what you want, when you want, where you want to.
And honestly if our “tone” is going to be read into I'm going to read right back. If I'm only supposed to talk about what was clearly stated I'll only do so when I'm shown the same respect.
To susy's comment I will say that I have always taken pride in our ability to moderate ourselves, and I sincerely hope it continues.
To Rukya, and we haven't been saying any of the horrible things you've been attributing to our “tone”, but we have said that if things don't change we won't be staying, and interpreting the “tone” of your replies you seem okay with that.
My “family” is saying that they'd rather see me go then move an OT post to an OT section.
So from what I am reading most everyone agrees with the ideas posted, but hates us for the way we delivered them?
At this point I'm pretty cool with that.
Because if being the villain can actually finally generate some action on this OT problem I'll wear that black hat, and if it doesn't I'll feel better leaving at least having spoke my peace.
I was leaving, slowly but surely, I was leaving. Drifting more, and more because everywhere I turned every valid topic was getting flooded by OT, and I had less and less desire to bother with it, and yes with the Forum.
When I was approached with this I found myself with some new found hope that there might be a future for the Forum that went beyond (borrowing from Zinah) “one line flirt fests”.
The kinder gentler approach had been tried, if I remember correctly the “Blue's House” thread started because of those gentler methods, but for my part I didn't see the OT flirt fests in other threads slowed in the slightest.
So when a group of friends approached me with this idea I said I wanted to sign my name to it because I agreed with it whole-heartedly.
I think as important of a question in this discussion is… Why has it gotten to this point that we felt this was our best option?
Welcome Yellow, my take on this has been that there is very little ultimate right or ultimate wrongs. Many have their personal styles of play, and I know that it can vary for me according to who I am with.
I'm thinking the underlying problem is more in the partner being played with, but then again you are primarily talking guys here and that's not exactly my field of expertise.
I do feel the need to ask though, do you communicate what you are expecting to them in advance? I've found most users here eventually develop what we've playfully called a “screening process” where we talk a bit with the prospective partner and see if they are going to be comfortable playing in the style we want to play.
-
AuthorPosts