Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
What will probably be even worse is neither will I, and for better or worse I'd be willing to bet it won't be seen in November.
Far, FAR to subtle for the Development Team's supposed imaginations.
AKA Not enough cock.
And if they had been giving nominal support to FF development I wouldn't be as pissed off as I am. I'd still be making fun of it (and them) but at this point it's been a good three months since there's been a FF position that doesn't involve sucking silicone.
Actually at this point I'm leaning away from clueless and more towards lazy. I think they made this position for the shemale/shemale (the handjob is a tell IMHO) and just made it FF as an after thought. In this case the insult is more that FF doesn't warrant any effort in their books. I think the fact it was marketed as a FF is just a huge blunder on their part in a case of wanting to try to make it look like they weren't ignoring the FF they made it all the more clear that they are.
At this point I'm also willing to wager at the MOST there will be one new FF by Christmas.
I remember having a similar discussion over the dildo in the spanking position.
Which just continues to support the idea that the Development Team loves cock and assumes that a position can't be truly enjoyed unless it's there. The dildo being the next best thing in their eyes.
My point is more that an automatic increase might have your avatar right at the peak while you're still several paces away. For a visible meter that both partners can see anything other then the person indicating “I am here.” The point seems to get defeated.
The problem is that might have been their train of thought for the LAST FF position as well since that too was a strap on that also came out as a FS.
Which would say that it's been well over two months since they made a truly FF position.
That makes it more insulting rather then less.
Their mission statement at this point seems to be “Cocks and clothes.”
What also gets to me is my regular assumption that the other person isn't stupid, but to make that assumption now I have to assume they were willing (or intending) to release an insult veiled as a position.
That's the biggest thing. It felt like an afterthought. The hand job was the biggest clue to me. In the Woman with Woman thread I had a discussion over the virtues of sucking on strap ons, and she seemed to love the visual if nothing else, but the hand… that feels like a command that was made for flesh and blood and just carried over.
Oh it is absolutely suited for the shemales, far, FAR better suited then it is for FF… which is where I'm going with this rant.
Of course the fact it will almost certainly be another month or more before another FF implement doesn't help.
The way it's going that one will ALSO focus on their love of cock.
I would like to think that even the Het Set users would say that a man can satisfy a woman without his penis ever appearing. Yeah he might need it before he's satisfied, but this seeming NEED for a cock to be present shows a serious lack of understanding of sexuality from the programmers of a sexually based game.
I'm sorry, I'm still pissed, one of the moves for the woman on top is a hand job… seriously, you grab the FAKE shaft and stroke it up and down! They didn't half ass it, the quarter assed it at best!
I have to wonder if I pissed off the Development Team, because it's either a case of “Hah! It's a new position, but it's a FF position BASED ON COCK!” and they literally hope I choke on it.
That or they just really, REALLY like cock.
I mean seriously! If I thought it would help I would be tempted to say I want the A$150 I spent to see what this position was like.
It looks like they came out with a SS position that works the same, but after two months without a single implement, and the one two months ago ALSO being about sucking a strap on!
AChat HAS turned into a damn sausage fest, and if you don't have a taste for it you are shit outta luck!
Welcome Amy, I must admit it's nice to have another female here to speak up with me. While I truly appreciate everyone's support having another person who uses FF call for FF is a wonderful thing.
Really? I figured you'd have better uses for my mouth.
November 10, 2010 at 10:32 pm in reply to: A little protest. Can’t use Mistress Outfit as Sex Clothes!! NOW RESOLVED. #42201Actually they changed it. You can now. It's one of the few things they got right.
The counter would be that an automatic increase detaches it from the users response and kinda misses the point.
Not trying to be contrary (honest) but on my list of reasons to be pissed off at the development team the Orgasm Meter isn't on it. As it stands it seems to fully serve it's purpose as it is now.
-
AuthorPosts