Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
I really don't have to think that much about it.
This was a huge topic back when I was first starting here on the rights of those who may be into age play versus the right of AChat to make sure it's protected from any legal concerns. Just about all you can do is report them and avoid them when they are saying they are really underage.
Hey you! I would try to grab you, but I imagine I'd have better luck catching you if I bent over that desk. :-* :-* :-*
Tom, I hope at this point you know I'm never out to create disputes. Discussions certainly, but never disputes.
While I have been a strong speaker for more FF positions I have also been one of the first if not the first to say that I GET it's economics.
I'm hoping some numbers will help show why I felt I needed to reopen this discussion.
On the home page there are twenty pictures representing implements stretching back to August 29th, roughly seven weeks.
There are 6 FM, 5 Clothing, 5 FS, 2 MM, 1 FFM, and 1 FF.
Almost two months and one implement. It was a similar stretch that led me to open this thread in the first place, and I hope no one begrudges me saying “I'm still here, still queer, and would like SOMETHING new.”
Heck even say 2FM/1 S(F,M,or S)/1 FF would be marvelous too. One of my mantras here is that equal is expecting a great deal since the percentages aren't equal, but wanting the gap a bit narrower is far more reasonable.
Which one? : 🙂
😛 It’s buried I presume.
As far as the MM we’ve had some of the guys stop in, and we’ve told them to speak up and get others to do so, but nothing.
The thing to remember with AChat is that it doesn’t get any tax payer subsidies. It has to support itself, and I get that. I’m not asking for any favors or hand outs. I’m just asking for a chance to spend my money on positions instead of yet another hideously over-priced dress.
😛
Oh Honey they don’t need to be exclusive. I’m just saying that in comparison to how long shemales have been available you are doing fairly well for yourselves.
🙂
Which is why I mention it Bear. 🙂
For Tight, I get that I’m a minority in comparison to what I’ve nicknamed the “Het Set” which means Straight and Bisexual women and men… those who are oriented to use FM positions. So I don’t expect “equal”. I get that this is a service and the FM are the core of their customer base, but not the whole. So I just felt I should remind them of that. 😉
Okay, I just did my own bitch post, but I feel the need to comment. The last FF post was on 9-10, since then 4 shemale positions have been posted. So that seems to show a willingness to follow through. The shemale option in and of itself is new, but they are following up.
Yeah, but you can click the button a few more times to get there.
Which is the whole idea, being able to communicate levels rather then having to type “Close!” until “Cumming!”
It's not perfect, but I don't see how it could be improved, I mean if it doesn't have user input *I* feel the purpose it defeated.
I decided it was time to bump this because it seems to be becoming an issue once more.
I'm happy it's not all FM, VERY happy.
I would just like to be able to buy something besides more ridiculously priced dresses.
I'm wondering if I need to keep reminding the Development Team the Homo and Bi women are here because when I don't we seem to get forgotten quickly enough.
Wouldn't putting it on automatic sort of defeat the purpose?
I regularly use the FF 69 position kiss as a sort of afterglow position, but yes it is most definitely needed, and needed across the board for all the possibilities.
But then again foreplay is still needed across the board…
October 19, 2010 at 9:53 am in reply to: Sandyspinner. Hey to all the Sexy ones I know.. Long time no see #44085Very nice to see you Sandy. I'm guessing I must have joined about the time you went on hiatus because I remember seeing your posts, and regretting the fact I seemed to have missed getting to know you.
I'm happy to see that's not quite the case.
-
AuthorPosts