Skip to content

Natalya

- Not logged in to forum -

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Natalya
    Participant

      Wouldn't something like a limit make it possible to abuse the system in such a way? I understand it on one hand, but on the other it's annyoing that it's impossible.

      Thanks for the explanations.

      in reply to: Forum. Newest message first in Threads #51637
      Natalya
      Participant

        Welcome to the forum Natalya.

        Thanks :)

        Susy means the posts on the forum. Newest post is placed on the last page of the thread. She suggests it should be on the first..

        So only the last, not reverse ordering as it already exists? Sorry, misunderstood it in that case.

        in reply to: Forum. Newest message first in Threads #51634
        Natalya
        Participant

          Leave as is. Which is can configure it in the user control panel.

          in reply to: Dammit!!!!! Disconnected Woes!! #50235
          Natalya
          Participant

            After a couple of minutes of swearing loudly and violently whilst trying to log back on I discover that the internet cable has decided to fall out of the wall socket, all by itself!!

            Buy yourself some wireless cables – they don't fall out *wink* *wink* *nudge* *nudge*  ;D

            in reply to: How about a "Tabbed" chat system? #50100
            Natalya
            Participant

              Something like “ignore for this session” (of AChat) might also be great. Like the idea about tabbed chat and especially the “General tab”, which I imagine as a more interesting way of “meeting” people in AChat.

              And while we're at it, why not also an option to ignore invites while I chat – i.e. when I want someone to invite me I unlock it, if I want to invite someone they have to unlock it.

              in reply to: Public Rooms for Voyeurs and Sex in Public Places #51434
              Natalya
              Participant

                +1 for the idea. *bump* ;D

                Edit: shouldn’t there be a poll for such requests? : 🙂

                in reply to: MF Pose Review – 54. Gentle Foreplay (F on table) #51488
                Natalya
                Participant

                  I tried this pose out with a very good friend I’ve made on here – we were both extremely impressed by the work of the Dev Team on this one 🙂

                  +1

                  I hope we’ll get more poses which are both more natural and where more things are possible, like for example a real 69 for FS… I don’t much like sucking on rubber when there’s a pussy to play with. 😛

                  +1

                  Natalya
                  Participant

                    I wholeheartedly support the motion of Abadonna. *bump*

                    in reply to: BDSM, Bondage and Fetish Poses. #48690
                    Natalya
                    Participant

                      Just wanted to chime in and say that I like the BDSM ideas.

                      What's missing are, among other things, symbols like collars (in the form of “jewelry” or “clothes”) and so on and gags – also with effect, although I imagine that the gagged partner can simply use “passive role-play” (*shudders*, *shivers*, “squeals”, *whinces*, *sobs* … you get the idea  ;)) and limit the verbal role-play to basic muffled sounds as they would be expected from a gagged person (which is what I role-play when I give head and the partner asks a question or expects some reaction).

                      I think for those of us who love the role-playing aspect in AChat, this would already be an interesting addition without having to invent/add extra positions (which I imagine as the bigger effort).  So for these basic BDSM effects you wouldn't even need to create extra new positions but they would introduce one more facet beyond the “cuffed” positions. Of course I wouldn't mind restraints (that have an effect on the restrained) or whips and so on.

                      If someone is not into this kind of play, there is always the option to exit the room. And those interested in the scenario will happily play along however restrained they are.

                      No idea whether this would work, but it seems to work for panties (if we consider “clothing”): it should be possible to remove a gag and put it back on, too.

                    Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)