Skip to content

shelley_k

- Not logged in to forum -

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BombShell #140662
    shelley_k
    Participant

      Wow, thank you for all of the advice, everyone.  I'll put it to use and keep going.  I really appreciate you all taking the time out to help me. :-)

      in reply to: BombShell #140658
      shelley_k
      Participant

        [img]http://i.imgur.com/rihIg2y.jpg/[/img]

        GWjanAq.jpg

        pwmT7Jz.jpg

        cE08VIW.jpg

        in reply to: BombShell #140657
        shelley_k
        Participant

          3frjuQW.jpg

          Gp5VfFJ.jpg

          hyoC8TP.jpg

          tolu3ph.jpg

          in reply to: Music Association Game #29077
          shelley_k
          Participant

            Loves Me Like A Rock
            – Paul Simon

            in reply to: Need new MMF poses to match MFF! #133087
            shelley_k
            Participant

              I'm kind of late with a response, but I love that Vaelene brought up this topic.  This game is very straight-male-oriented with the poses.  It seems like 99% of the FMF poses have women being bisexual so that the men can get turned on more.  It's not the same for MFM at all with bisexuality.  In fact it's more of a group fantasy for men in both cases of FMF and MFM instead of equal pleasure options in both the male and female partners' poses.  These pose options should be addressed as there are a lot of paying customers who are straight women and anyone else who agrees, for that matter.

              in reply to: GANGBANG #134978
              shelley_k
              Participant

                i love the idea of groups with more than three people too. Like maybe there could be certain rooms with orgy parties or swinging parties going on, and members could just join by selecting a room like selecting a person in the current format. The rooms would show who is in it or how many people are in it if it’s a public room. There could be more private ones too that are password protected. That would be so much fun. ;D

                in reply to: Forum Game: Yes or No #104954
                shelley_k
                Participant

                  No, I want to write the next great American mystery novel.  :D

                  The next one sewed at least one garment from scratch in the past decade.

                  in reply to: Forum Game: …OR..? #129092
                  shelley_k
                  Participant

                    That's a hard one, I like them both, but can actually play a flute.

                    Flute.

                    Morning jog or midnight stroll?

                    in reply to: Saving Changes on Avatar in The Client Problems #140281
                    shelley_k
                    Participant

                      Hi! Thank you for that quick response. I was surfing through the forums and saw his answer yesterday though.

                      😛 i had already tried that, but still it didn’t work. Hopefully the developers will give me an answer soon. Thank you. 🙂

                      in reply to: Female Imposters #42746
                      shelley_k
                      Participant

                        Guys posing as women isn't just an AChat problem, the poser thing happens all over the Net. Why do some guys do that? I don't know, I'm not a pysch major. I do know that it creates problems for real women:

                        1. Somehow I then become obligated to “prove” who I am, while a guy gets a pass. This is outright gender bias, it violates my right to some anonymity (as a person, not necessarily as a gender), and is a blatant insult to me, because they're calling into question MY integrity, either implicitly or explicitly.
                        2. An extension of the first is the pic, voice or cam request. This isn't totally a poser issue, as some want that kind of interaction that is outside the scope of AChat to enhance the  online experience; which is fine for those who do it consensually. Where it becomes intrusive and gender-biased is when there is a demand to do it to somehow prove who I am.
                        3. The gender doubt thing creates a whole doubt issue that can't be readily resolved without the woman having to bear the burden of proof. Oh really, it's my responsibility for who you're trying to cyber-bang? As Rocio said, there are ways to tell who is probably a poser. There are a lot of guys who don't care about any kind of meaningful chat and getting to know who you are first, they just want some quick cyber action (and usually in a crass, rude way). So if guys like babybuggybumper (BigTex) want to be more sure, maybe they ought to treat a woman like a person and not some object to stick their cyber pixels into. Ask the guys who do make it a practice to chat and know you first, making those connections in chat does nothing but improve the whole rest of the experience.

                        Anyway, that's my quick take on it. Maybe I'll post this over in the non-techy area too, because it is something that happens; I've seen it happen, so maybe there's some way to discuss it (but without maybe tipping off the posers to what the tell-tale signs are lol).

                        Preach!  I don't like the fact that these people want women to prove themselves as real women.  That is much to intrusive for a virtual sex game.  If you do not believe that a person is the gender of their avatar, then that's a risk you will have to take.  Try to get to know the person.  It's completely ridiculous to make a list of people who refuse to prove their gender.

                      Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)