Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
My personal battle to get back in the saddle.
Billy Joel – My Life
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3JFEfdK_Ls
[img width=500]https://cdn11.bigcommerce.com/s-n6h3dlxzq9/images/stencil/800×800/products/49449/189875/SLPT9BKH159__92413.1610566746.jpg?c=2[/img]
Billy Joel – Movin' Out
I was quite sad to hear of this man's passing. RIP.
Edelweiss – Christopher Plummer's own voice – Sound of Music 1965
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obEm1Mqm7C0Whilst the removal of topics is under way in this new climate of attempts to gag any kind of free exchange of opinions and views which is the very idea of a forum.
Can we also have some order brought to the disarray that the forum has been allowed to fall into please?As an example : Why are “Sexy Photos” included in a section entitled ” Quizz, Fav TV, Fav Music, Fav Films, Books… “?
There are enough dedicated sections for this type of thing without it appearing in a section that makes no mention of anything of the kind.
Yes, I know that Achat is a “sex site”, but it's nice to be able to get away from that occasionally. Which I assume is the reason that section was created.Just a request which will no doubt be unpopular with the posters of porn. But I'm a member too.
Am I not allowed to make a request?I think it is a very good idea to look at some topics and ask for removal but not without the permission of the Original Poster if they are still around. I do not give permission for any of mine to be removed.
Who is behind this though and who decides? Is it voluntary amongst members or is Achat involved?
attempts to gag any kind of free exchange of opinions and views which is the very idea of a forum. Can we also have some order brought to the disarray that the forum has been allowed to fall into please?
I have to take issue however with some comments made by the original poster in this topic. They are said as though others are responsible for such behaviour. The poster was one who tried to gag and humiliate someone for talking about their sexual preferences.
The issues may be resolved now but still the underlying currents are there and could easily happen again with others.Free speech is one thing and everyone is entitled to their opinion but only where laws and Achats terms of service of forum are followed.
Bullying and harassment should be stamped on and agreement made by all members here for tolerance rather than hiding behind nasty shitty comments, wrecking topics and being arseholes saying … he/she deserved it; its a joke, where's your humour.
No one deserves to be ganged up on, laughed at or humiliated. That's not the forum I joined and I don't think anyone should condone that behaviour as acceptable. It doesn't matter how you try and justify it.There was a nice rule here once where it was agreed between members and moderators, that names in text, chat or in screenshots would be removed so no embarrassment was caused, even if that was the original posters intention. Permission had to be sought from all parties before publishing. If it wasn't, the moderators would remove the names or post. That should be bought back again.
Then theres' the behaviour of posting rubbish (not on topic) in threads that are not even her topics and was not pleasant for others who enjoy them. The subject of the Topic should be noted and the following posts looked at as examples for reference.
I mention this because I politely asked it to stop and was attacked pretty much like my friend who I had invited to Forum in the first place.What many may not realise is that there is a lot more people who read Forum than actively post. So posters should understand that Forum is a big public platform and their behaviour reflects on them and on the forum here.
Your behaviour can actually dictate on people views of forum, whether they join or whether they stay.
Your posts or even behaviour here or in the game that show rudeness and disrespect will cause the reactions for the drama that usually ensues.If this place is going to be given a spring clean, behaviours should also be looked at. There should be an agreement between members to respect other members and the owners of topics.
If there is an objection to a post as its nasty or off topic, then the poster should consider removing it without attacking the requester or trying to put them in their place, or trying to be “Super Arsehole clever”Example – I know the the Queen died centuries ago but its the Obituary thread.
We can all post like that and totally fuck forum up, but we don't do we. If you really must, start a new topic called Queens or something.Yes, I know that Achat is a “sex site”, but it's nice to be able to get away from that occasionally. Which I assume is the reason that section was created.
Just a request which will no doubt be unpopular with the posters of porn. But I'm a member too.There are plenty of topics not sexual and enjoyed by many here. I think the original poster should decide if the content is sexual or optional and the thread reflect that. People who just post in the thread cant decide to change the rules half way. And trying to deliberately sabotage a topic because you believe it should not be sexual is just as bad as being “Super Arsehole clever”
I think in general, as it is a sex site, unless totally obvious in the topic subject, members do assume they can post naughty images or saucy dialogue in them.
Its what Achat is – Adult Chat and content. So if you don't want it sexual, make it obvious in the explanatory first post and give a few example posts too. I'm sure most posters will follow what the Topic maker wants and if they make a mistake, a gentle poke will result in it being removed.I hope that Forum can move forward and members be pleasant and kind to each other.
Lets hope we all have the strength to lead by example rather than cause the disarray mentioned.
But I will admit my strength to turn the other cheek is none existent and if I feel someone is trying to pick on me, they will endure my wrath.
I have had enough disrespect shown me these last months to last me an Achat lifetime.No one's insulted anyone as far as I can see Stone. Other than you “gay bashing” lesbians in a PM to me.
You want an insult? Here's one.
Shut up you whining cunt and take your ass back to your “master”.
Good job on inflaming and escalating a minor disagreement into a full scale battle you blinkered bitch.
LOL
Did you not post a penis being nailed. Thats man hating
Did you not post a penis being repeatedly bashed. Thats penis bashing
Did you not post !I'm proud to be Lesbian. Thats not an insult thenI'm not a submissive. I keep telling you.
What's the matter PM not good enough? You give up there now cus I wiped the floor with you?
You want it all public to wreck this topic?You are the bitch name calling names.
You made this nice request I made to go to PM a full scale row.
That's on you luv.
I just wont let you get away with it like others.No comment ! Grazie !
I apologize to the gods of the forum !PFFFT
Pffffttt…..take your toy ( forum ) back…dont cry.
Seems you and friends are the ones bullying, harassing and insulting people across a number of topics and when asked to stop attack those members as well and then are determined to trash topics to spoil it for others.
I don't see anyone else behaving as you and your friends are.
You just show yourselves up. Take it to PM with the people concerned.
Let us who enjoy certain topics, enjoy without your drivel.That's not erotic and sexual domination. Its more sadistic and torture!
Maybe for another topic?
Or are we all going to rubbish and spoil topics now?It's a shame that the idiots that provoked all this have somehow left it to you, who has no involvement, to speak for them.
I imagine they're too busy cowering behind their fake titles and have left it to a sub to utter.
I've removed what you and the other humourless fools don't like.
I'd appreciate it if you and those you choose to bend the knee to do others the same courtesy.
In future, don't address me. Know your place.Thank you for removing the posts.
Just so you know I am not a submissive. And I'm already in a very good place.That's not erotic and sexual domination. Its more sadistic and torture!
Maybe for another topic?
Or are we all going to rubbish and spoil topics now?Alina Baraz – Say You Know
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttpQYkqfuEwSay You Know – Alina Baraz
'Member the way
You used to say
I was your meaning?
You'd always need me
Did you forget
What that shit meant?
You were my answer
You were what mattered
Lived at your place
Know the way that I taste
Yeah, you know things
Yeah, you know things
I met your mom
Even got us a dog
That ain't nothing, oh
Say you know me
Say you know me
Say you know me, know
Say you know me
Say you know me
Say you know me
You always will
Your tone was cold
Over the phone
Can you just meet me?
We could speak freely
Talkin' it out
Messin' around
Kissin' it better
Make me remember
Lived at your place
Know the way that I taste
Yeah, you know things
Yeah, you know things
I met your mom
Even got us a dog
That ain't nothing
Say you know me
Say you know me
Say you know me, know
Say you know…Blurred Lines RobinThicke
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyDUC1LUXSUWaiting to take you for a ride…
MMMMM And you surely did!
[img]https://media1.tenor.com/images/267cb515cf6f7a71bbfb3270b1da3fe1/tenor.gif?itemid=11560979[/img]
[img width=200]https://media1.tenor.com/images/dbbe25c547841a827ca8e84df0504bd3/tenor.gif?itemid=16814422[/img]
goodnight, precious stone
[img]https://media1.tenor.com/images/5bfd9e5ffa81240509033916c99ffe79/tenor.gif?itemid=8177146[/img]
Thank you and sweet dreams
Welcome to the mad house.
A Parisian was given a small fine for ‘getting medieval’ on his wife
In the 1930s, Paris baker Henri Littière had a major marital problem: his wife was desperate to be faithful, but just couldn’t help herself. She had three affairs in as many months before he decided that something must be done.
He visited a museum and came out with sketches of medieval chastity belts.[img]https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/7/2018/01/Chastity-belt-15th-century-2-f7b5a8f.jpg?webp=true&quality=90&resize=620%2C413[/img]
These he gave to a man who made false arms and legs for veterans of the First World War, asking him to knock him up a secure means of keeping Mme Littière from consummating her infidelities.
He brought his wife to the final fitting, and she pronounced herself satisfied with the comfort of the velvet-covered steel contraption and joked with her husband that he mustn’t lose the key.
Some time later, however, one of her former lovers came to visit. One thing led to another and he saw the apparatus she was wearing.
He went straight to the police, and Mr Littière appeared in court on 21 January 1934 on charges of cruelty.
Although Mrs Littière testified that she found it impossible to be faithful, the judge gave the hapless baker a three-month suspended sentence and a 50-franc fine. -
AuthorPosts